• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Integrating Higher-Order Multiple-Choice Questions into Medical Education: How Best to Support Students for Change?

作者信息

Nanthagopan Gopija

机构信息

Medical Education Department, Ealing Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 9;35(1):587-588. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02164-z. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02164-z
PMID:40144130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11933478/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Integrating Higher-Order Multiple-Choice Questions into Medical Education: How Best to Support Students for Change?将高阶多项选择题融入医学教育：如何最好地支持学生做出改变？
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 9;35(1):587-588. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02164-z. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”：影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Exploring the use of ChatGPT-4o in enhancing career development counseling for medical students: a study protocol.探讨 ChatGPT-4o 在增强医学生职业发展咨询中的应用：一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e083697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083697.
4
Medical Students' Perspectives on Family Planning and Impact on Specialty Choice.医学生对计划生育的看法及其对专业选择的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Feb 1;159(2):170-178. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6392.
5
How Medical Students Benefit from Participating in a Longitudinal Resource Stewardship Medical Education Program (STARS): An International Descriptive Evaluation.医学生如何从参与纵向资源管理医学教育项目（STARS）中受益：一项国际描述性评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):146-152. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08971-9. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验：对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23.基于案例的学习在健康专业教育中的效果。BEME 系统评价：BEME 指南第 23 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421-44. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.
8
Patient safety education for undergraduate medical students: a systematic review.本科医学生患者安全教育：系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 14;11:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-33.
9
Learning how to talk about approaching death: results from a pre-test post-test trial on the effectiveness of a blended-learning approach.学习如何谈论濒死之事：一项关于混合式学习方法有效性的前后测试验结果
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07178-8.
10
Enhancing Visibility and Mentorship for Future Women in Medicine: A Qualitative Study.提高未来医学领域女性的知名度与导师指导：一项定性研究。
S D Med. 2025 May;78(suppl 5):s35-s36.

本文引用的文献

1
. Validation of Guidance for Writing Higher-Order Multiple-Choice Questions in Medical Science Education.医学科学教育中高阶多项选择题编写指南的验证
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Aug 20;34(6):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02140-7. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Question banks: credit? Or debit? A qualitative exploration of their use among medical students.题库：信用？还是负债？对医学生使用题库的定性探索。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 24;24(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05517-9.
3
Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.医学生学业评估中的论述题考试：患者没有多项选择。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1649959. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1649959.
4
Medical students: what educational resources are they using?医学生：他们在使用哪些教育资源？
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9.
5
Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.好的评估标准：来自渥太华 2010 会议的共识声明和建议。
Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559.
6
The modified essay question: its exit from the exit examination?修改后的论文题：它是否会退出毕业考试？
Med Teach. 2010;32(7):e300-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.488705.