Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mol Oncol. 2024 Nov;18(11):2770-2782. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13650. Epub 2024 May 24.
Advances in therapeutic approaches for melanoma urge the need for biomarkers that can identify patients at risk for recurrence and to guide treatment. The potential use of liquid biopsies in identifying biomarkers is increasingly being recognized. Here, we present a head-to-head comparison of several techniques to analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in 20 patients with metastatic melanoma. In this study, we investigated whether diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) combined with multimarker flow cytometry (FCM) increased the detection of CTCs in blood compared to the CellSearch platform. Additionally, we characterized cfDNA at the level of somatic mutations, extent of aneuploidy and genome-wide DNA methylation. Both CTCs and cfDNA measures were compared to tumor markers and extracranial tumor burden on radiological imaging. Compared to the CellSearch method applied on peripheral blood, DLA combined with FCM increased the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs from 35% to 70% (P = 0.06). However, the median percentage of cells that could be recovered by the DLA procedure was 29%. Alternatively, cfDNA mutation and methylation analysis detected tumor load in the majority of patients (90% and 93% of samples successfully analyzed, respectively). The aneuploidy score was positive in 35% of all patients. From all tumor measurements in blood, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly correlated to variant allele frequency (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the presence of CTCs in DLA was associated with tumor burden (P < 0.001), whereas the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood was associated with number of lesions on radiological imaging (P < 0.001). In conclusion, DLA tended to increase the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs but was also associated with low recovery. Both cfDNA and CTCs were correlated with clinical parameters such as LDH levels and extracranial tumor burden.
治疗黑色素瘤的方法不断进步,这就迫切需要能够识别有复发风险的患者并指导治疗的生物标志物。液体活检在识别生物标志物方面的潜在应用越来越受到认可。在这里,我们对 20 名转移性黑色素瘤患者的几种循环肿瘤细胞 (CTC) 和无细胞游离 DNA (cfDNA) 分析技术进行了头对头比较。在本研究中,我们研究了与 CellSearch 平台相比,诊断性白细胞分离术 (DLA) 联合多标记流式细胞术 (FCM) 是否增加了血液中 CTC 的检测。此外,我们还对 cfDNA 进行了体细胞突变、非整倍体程度和全基因组 DNA 甲基化水平的特征分析。将 CTC 和 cfDNA 检测结果与肿瘤标志物和影像学检查的颅外肿瘤负担进行了比较。与应用于外周血的 CellSearch 方法相比,DLA 联合 FCM 将可检测到 CTC 的患者比例从 35%提高到 70%(P=0.06)。然而,DLA 过程中可回收细胞的中位数比例为 29%。相反,cfDNA 突变和甲基化分析在大多数患者中检测到肿瘤负荷(分别有 90%和 93%的样本成功分析)。所有患者中有 35%的患者存在非整倍体评分阳性。在所有血液肿瘤标志物中,乳酸脱氢酶 (LDH) 水平与变异等位基因频率显著相关(P=0.004)。此外,DLA 中 CTC 的存在与肿瘤负担相关(P<0.001),而外周血中 CTC 的存在与影像学检查中的病灶数量相关(P<0.001)。总之,DLA 倾向于增加可检测到 CTC 的患者比例,但也与低回收率相关。cfDNA 和 CTC 均与 LDH 水平和颅外肿瘤负担等临床参数相关。