German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Oncogene. 2021 Aug;40(33):5204-5212. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01928-w. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
Genetic investigation of tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution in solid cancers could be assisted by the analysis of liquid biopsies. However, tumors of various entities might release different quantities of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) into the bloodstream, potentially limiting the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy in distinct tumor histologies. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and melanoma (MEL) were enrolled in the study, representing tumors with different metastatic patterns. Mutation profiles of cfDNA, CTCs, and tumor tissue were assessed by panel sequencing, targeting 327 cancer-related genes. In total, 30 tissue, 18 cfDNA, and 7 CTC samples from 18 patients were sequenced. Best concordance between the mutation profile of tissue and cfDNA was achieved in CRC and MEL, possibly due to the remarkable heterogeneity of HNSCC (63%, 55% and 11%, respectively). Concordance especially depended on the amount of cfDNA used for library preparation. While 21 of 27 (78%) tissue mutations were retrieved in high-input cfDNA samples (30-100 ng, N = 8), only 4 of 65 (6%) could be detected in low-input samples (<30 ng, N = 10). CTCs were detected in 13 of 18 patients (72%). However, downstream analysis was limited by poor DNA quality, allowing targeted sequencing of only seven CTC samples isolated from four patients. Only one CTC sample reflected the mutation profile of the respective tumor. Private mutations, which were detected in CTCs but not in tissue, suggested the presence of rare subclones. Our pilot study demonstrated superiority of cfDNA- compared to CTC-based mutation profiling. It was further shown that CTCs may serve as additional means to detect rare subclones possibly involved in treatment resistance. Both findings require validation in a larger patient cohort.
实体瘤的肿瘤异质性和克隆进化的遗传研究可以通过液体活检的分析来辅助。然而,不同实体的肿瘤可能会将不同数量的循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)释放到血液中,这可能会限制液体活检在不同肿瘤组织学中的诊断潜力。患有晚期结直肠癌(CRC)、头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)和黑色素瘤(MEL)的患者被纳入该研究,这些肿瘤具有不同的转移模式。通过靶向 327 个癌症相关基因的面板测序,评估 cfDNA、CTC 和肿瘤组织的突变谱。总共对 18 名患者的 30 个组织、18 个 cfDNA 和 7 个 CTC 样本进行了测序。CRC 和 MEL 中组织和 cfDNA 的突变谱之间的最佳一致性,可能是由于 HNSCC 的显著异质性(分别为 63%、55%和 11%)。一致性特别取决于用于文库制备的 cfDNA 量。虽然在高输入 cfDNA 样本(30-100ng,N=8)中可检测到 27 个组织突变中的 21 个(78%),但在低输入样本(<30ng,N=10)中仅可检测到 65 个突变中的 4 个(6%)。在 18 名患者中的 13 名患者中检测到 CTC。然而,下游分析受到 DNA 质量差的限制,仅允许对从 4 名患者中分离出的 7 个 CTC 样本进行靶向测序。只有一个 CTC 样本反映了各自肿瘤的突变谱。仅在 CTC 中检测到而不在组织中检测到的私有突变表明存在罕见的亚克隆。我们的初步研究表明 cfDNA 比 CTC 基于的突变分析具有优势。进一步表明 CTC 可能是检测可能涉及治疗抵抗的罕见亚克隆的附加手段。这两个发现都需要在更大的患者队列中进行验证。