Tamini Sofia, Bondesan Adele, Caroli Diana, Sartorio Alessandro
Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Experimental Laboratory for Auxo-Endocrinological Research, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy.
Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Experimental Laboratory for Auxo-Endocrinological Research, 20145 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 11;13(10):2843. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102843.
: The concomitant occurrence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) causes a significant worsening of a patient's clinical condition. Indexes that employ anthropometric measurements alone or associated with blood parameters have been investigated for their ability to identify MetS. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three of these indexes, the body adiposity index (BAI), the lipid accumulation product index (LAP), and the cardiometabolic index (CMI), in a cohort of 1912 adult subjects with obesity. : MetS was found in 62.3% of the enrolled subjects, with a higher prevalence in males (72.5%) than females (60.9%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to define which index performed better. The BAI was found to be the lowest-performing index, with an ROC area of 0.50, a sensitivity of 30.31%, a specificity of 74.48%, and a likelihood ratio of 1.19. On the contrary, the LAP and the CMI showed a comparable ROC area of 0.82. The LAP had a sensitivity of 63.06%, a specificity of 86.55%, and a likelihood ratio of 4.69, while the CMI had a sensitivity of 67.59%, specificity of 81.55%, and a likelihood ratio of 3.66. The analysis was also performed in the group divided into males and females, with overlapping results. : The LAP and the CMI performed better than the BAI in detecting MetS both in the general population with obesity and in the male/female subgroups. In the future, it will be important to validate these useful diagnostic tools in order to employ them in clinical practices.
肥胖与代谢综合征(MetS)同时出现会导致患者临床状况显著恶化。人们已经研究了仅采用人体测量指标或与血液参数相关的指标来识别MetS的能力。本研究旨在评估其中三个指标,即身体肥胖指数(BAI)、脂质蓄积产物指数(LAP)和心脏代谢指数(CMI)在1912名肥胖成年受试者队列中的诊断准确性。在纳入的受试者中,62.3%被发现患有MetS,男性患病率(72.5%)高于女性(60.9%)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来确定哪个指标表现更佳。结果发现BAI是表现最差的指标,ROC曲线下面积为0.50,灵敏度为30.31%,特异度为74.48%,似然比为1.19。相反,LAP和CMI的ROC曲线下面积相当,为0.82。LAP的灵敏度为63.06%,特异度为86.55%,似然比为4.69,而CMI的灵敏度为67.59%,特异度为81.55%,似然比为3.66。该分析也在按性别划分的组中进行,结果重叠。在肥胖的普通人群以及男性/女性亚组中,LAP和CMI在检测MetS方面比BAI表现更好。未来,验证这些有用的诊断工具以便将其应用于临床实践将很重要。