Xue Jin, Xie Dongcheng, Lu Xinyi, Niu Zihan, Marmolejo-Ramos Fernando
School of Foreign Studies, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
University of South Australia Online, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 10;18:1387674. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1387674. eCollection 2024.
Psycholinguistic studies have argued for the age of acquisition (AoA) of words as a marker of concept learning, showing that the semantic features of concepts themselves influence the age at which their labels are learned. However, empirical evidence suggests that semantic features such as imageability and linguistic phenomena such as frequency do not adequately predict AoA. The present study takes the developmental approach of embodied cognition and investigates the effects of sensorimotor experiences on the ease of acquisition of the concept acquired in bilinguals. Specifically, we investigated (1) whether the sensorimotor experience can explain AoA beyond frequency; (2) and whether these patterns are consistent across L1 Chinese and L2 English.
We conducted sensorimotor rating measures in both Chinese and English on 207 items in which Chinese-English bilingual adults were requested to evaluate the extent to which they experienced concepts by employing six perceptual senses and five effectors for actions located in various regions of the body. Meanwhile, data on AoA and frequency were collected.
The present study showed the sensorimotor experience was closely linked with AoAs in both languages. However, the correlation analysis revealed a trend of higher correlations between AoAs for the same concepts and L1 Chinese, relative to L2 English for the present Chinese-English bilinguals. Importantly, the hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that after controlling for frequency, sensorimotor experience explained additional variance in L1 AoA. However, L2 sensorimotor experience did not explain the variance in L2 AoA. Sensorimotor experience explained more share of variance in L1 AoA but frequency accounted for more variance in L2 AoA.
The findings suggest that concept acquisition should consider the grounding in appropriate sensorimotor experience beyond linguistic phenomena like frequency.
心理语言学研究主张将单词的习得年龄(AoA)作为概念学习的一个标志,表明概念本身的语义特征会影响其标签的习得年龄。然而,实证证据表明,诸如可想象性等语义特征以及诸如频率等语言现象并不能充分预测习得年龄。本研究采用具身认知的发展方法,调查感觉运动经验对双语者习得概念的难易程度的影响。具体而言,我们调查了:(1)感觉运动经验是否能在频率之外解释习得年龄;(2)这些模式在母语为中文和第二语言为英语的情况下是否一致。
我们用中文和英文对207个项目进行了感觉运动评级测量,要求中英双语成年人评估他们通过运用六种感知觉和位于身体不同部位的五种行动效应器来体验概念的程度。同时,收集了习得年龄和频率的数据。
本研究表明,感觉运动经验在两种语言中都与习得年龄密切相关。然而,相关分析显示,对于本研究中的中英双语者来说,相同概念的习得年龄与母语中文之间的相关性相对于第二语言英语有更高的趋势。重要的是,分层回归分析表明,在控制频率后,感觉运动经验解释了母语习得年龄中的额外方差。然而,第二语言的感觉运动经验并没有解释第二语言习得年龄中的方差。感觉运动经验在母语习得年龄中解释的方差比例更大,但频率在第二语言习得年龄中解释的方差更多。
研究结果表明,概念习得应考虑在频率等语言现象之外,基于适当的感觉运动经验。