Burns Jane, Pollard David, Ali Ased, McCoy Colin P, Carson Louise, Wylie Matthew P
School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, U.K.
Convatec Technology Centre, First Avenue, Deeside Industrial Park, Convatec Limited, Deeside, Flintshire CH5 2NU, U.K.
ACS Omega. 2024 May 9;9(20):22410-22422. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c02109. eCollection 2024 May 21.
Hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters have improved the experience of intermittent urinary catheterization for patients compared to conventional gel-lubricated uncoated catheters. However, the incorporation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) within hydrophilic coatings can lead to significant issues with coating dry-out. Consequently, increased force on catheter withdrawal may cause complications, including urethral microtrauma and pain. Standard methods of evaluating catheter lubricity lack physiological relevance and an understanding of the surface interaction with the urethra. The tribological performance and urethral interaction of commercially available hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters and a coating-free integrated amphiphilic surfactant (IAS) catheter were evaluated by using a biomimetic urethral model designed from a modified coefficient of friction (CoF) assay. T24 human urothelial cells were cultured on customized silicone sheets as an alternate countersurface for CoF testing. Hydrophilic PVP-coated and coating-free IAS catheters were hydrated and the CoF obtained immediately following hydration, or after 2 min, mimicking in vivo indwell time for urine drainage. The model was observed for urethral epithelial cell damage postcatheterization. The majority of hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters caused significantly greater removal of cells from the monolayer after 2 min indwell time, compared to the IAS catheter. Hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters were shown to cause more cell damage than the coating-free IAS catheter. A biomimetic urethral model provides a more physiologically relevant model for understanding the factors that govern the frictional interface between a catheter surface and urethral tissue. From these findings, the use of coating-free IAS catheters instead of hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters may help reduce urethral microtrauma experienced during catheter withdrawal from the bladder, which may lead to a lower risk of infection.
与传统的凝胶润滑无涂层导尿管相比,亲水涂层间歇性导尿管改善了患者间歇性导尿的体验。然而,在亲水涂层中加入聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)可能会导致涂层干燥的严重问题。因此,拔管时增加的力可能会导致并发症,包括尿道微创伤和疼痛。评估导管润滑性的标准方法缺乏生理相关性,也无法理解其与尿道的表面相互作用。通过使用基于改进摩擦系数(CoF)测定法设计的仿生尿道模型,评估了市售亲水PVP涂层导尿管和无涂层集成两亲性表面活性剂(IAS)导尿管的摩擦学性能和尿道相互作用。将T24人尿路上皮细胞培养在定制的硅胶片上,作为CoF测试的替代对磨面。将亲水PVP涂层导尿管和无涂层IAS导尿管水化,并在水化后立即或2分钟后获得CoF,模拟尿液引流的体内留置时间。观察该模型在导尿后尿道上皮细胞的损伤情况。与IAS导尿管相比,大多数亲水PVP涂层导尿管在留置2分钟后导致单层细胞的显著更多脱落。结果表明,亲水PVP涂层导尿管比无涂层IAS导尿管造成更多的细胞损伤。仿生尿道模型为理解控制导管表面与尿道组织之间摩擦界面的因素提供了一个更具生理相关性的模型。根据这些发现,使用无涂层IAS导尿管而非亲水PVP涂层导尿管可能有助于减少从膀胱拔管时经历的尿道微创伤,这可能会降低感染风险。