• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认证考试及格分数的确定:一个未解决的问题。

Determination of passing scores on certification examinations: an unresolved issue.

作者信息

Karni K R, Lofsness K G

机构信息

Division of Medical Technology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 1985 Nov;14(4):415-26.

PMID:3880065
Abstract

In the field of clinical laboratory science, certification may be obtained by passing the National Certification Agency for Medical Laboratory Personnel (NCA) examination. This multiple-choice test is competence-based and criterion-referenced, and uses a modified Angoff procedure to establish the passing score. For this study, the NCA examination scores of 1,868 certification applicants (mostly new graduates) and 111 selected laboratory practitioners were compared. Although the NCA examination is designed to define the level of minimum competence, the failure rate of practitioners identified by their supervisors as minimally competent was almost four times greater that that of the certification applicants. Even the most competent group of practitioners scored well below the applicants for certification. These findings suggest that the examination cut-off point may not really define minimal competence and that the method used to determine the passing score might not be appropriate for certification examinations.

摘要

在临床检验科学领域,通过国家医学检验人员认证机构(NCA)考试可获得认证。这项多项选择题考试基于能力且参照标准,采用改进的安格夫程序来确定及格分数。在本研究中,比较了1868名认证申请人(大多为应届毕业生)和111名选定的实验室从业人员的NCA考试成绩。尽管NCA考试旨在界定最低能力水平,但被其主管认定为最低能力水平的从业人员的不及格率几乎是认证申请人的四倍。即使是最有能力的从业人员群体,其得分也远低于认证申请人。这些发现表明,考试及格点可能并未真正界定最低能力水平,且用于确定及格分数的方法可能不适用于认证考试。

相似文献

1
Determination of passing scores on certification examinations: an unresolved issue.认证考试及格分数的确定:一个未解决的问题。
J Allied Health. 1985 Nov;14(4):415-26.
2
Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations.聚类分析与安格夫方法在设定资格考试最低及格分数方面的融合。
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Dec;30(4):362-75. doi: 10.1177/0163278707307904.
3
Attributes of curriculum athletic training programs related to the passing rate of first-time certification examinees.与首次认证考生通过率相关的运动训练课程属性。
J Allied Health. 2003 Winter;32(4):240-5.
4
Preparing online students for comprehensive examinations.让在线学生为综合考试做好准备。
Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Summer;23(3 Suppl):3-59-62.
5
A work-centered approach for setting passing scores on performance-based assessments.一种基于工作的方法来设定基于表现的评估的及格分数。
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Sep;28(3):349-69. doi: 10.1177/0163278705278282.
6
Development of competency-based, career-entry examination for clinical laboratory personnel.针对临床实验室人员的基于能力的入职考试的开发。
Am J Med Technol. 1978 May;44(5):402-5.
7
Focus on quantitative methods. Determining cut-off scores.关注定量方法。确定临界值。
Res Nurs Health. 1996 Jun;19(3):249-56. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199606)19:3<249::AID-NUR8>3.0.CO;2-K.
8
A comparison of diagnostic and certifying examinations.诊断性检查与认证性检查的比较。
Am J Med Technol. 1977 May;43(5):436-9.
9
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.多项选择题考试中的标准设定与维持:医学教育与培训学会指南第37号
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247.
10
Predicting academic performance in medical technology: a university-based program in retrospect.预测医学技术专业的学业成绩:一项基于大学的回顾性项目。
Am J Med Technol. 1981 May;47(5):314-9.