• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沟通如何影响患者安全?系统评价和逻辑模型方案。

How does communication affect patient safety? Protocol for a systematic review and logic model.

机构信息

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK

Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 27;14(5):e085312. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085312.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085312
PMID:38802275
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11131125/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

One in 10 patients are harmed in healthcare, more than three million deaths occur annually worldwide due to patient safety incidents, and the economic burden of patient safety incidents accounts for 15% of hospital expenditure. Poor communication between patients and practitioners is a significant contributor to patient safety incidents. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which patient safety is affected by communication and to provide a logic model that illustrates how communication impacts patient safety.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies, reported in any language, that quantify the effects of practitioner and patient communication on patient safety. We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsychINfo, CENTRAL, Scopus and ProQuest theses and dissertations from 2013 to 7 February 2024. We will also hand-search references of included studies. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2 (RoB2) for randomised controlled trials. If appropriate, results will be pooled with summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); otherwise, we will conduct a narrative synthesis. We will organise our findings by healthcare discipline, type of communication and type of patient safety incident. We will produce a logic model to illustrate how communication impacts patient safety.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. Findings will be disseminated through international conferences, news and peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024507578.

摘要

简介

每 10 名患者中就有 1 人在医疗保健中受到伤害,全球每年有超过 300 万人因患者安全事件而死亡,患者安全事件的经济负担占医院支出的 15%。患者与医务人员之间沟通不畅是导致患者安全事件的一个重要因素。本研究旨在评估沟通对患者安全的影响程度,并提供一个逻辑模型,说明沟通如何影响患者安全。

方法与分析

我们将对 2013 年至 2024 年 2 月 7 日期间以任何语言报告的随机和非随机研究进行系统评价,这些研究量化了医生和患者沟通对患者安全的影响。我们将检索 MEDLINE、CINAHL、APA PsychINfo、CENTRAL、Scopus 和 ProQuest 论文和学位论文。我们还将对纳入研究的参考文献进行手工检索。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估将由两名独立评审员进行。非随机干预研究的 Cochrane 偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)将用于非随机研究,Cochrane 偏倚风险 2.0(RoB2)将用于随机对照试验。如果合适,将汇总估计值和 95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总;否则,将进行叙述性综合。我们将按医疗学科、沟通类型和患者安全事件类型组织研究结果。我们将制作一个逻辑模型来说明沟通如何影响患者安全。

伦理与传播

本系统评价不需要正式的伦理批准。研究结果将通过国际会议、新闻和同行评议期刊传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42024507578。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a2/11131125/290b9abafe53/bmjopen-2024-085312f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a2/11131125/8673eae98a9c/bmjopen-2024-085312f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a2/11131125/290b9abafe53/bmjopen-2024-085312f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a2/11131125/8673eae98a9c/bmjopen-2024-085312f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a2/11131125/290b9abafe53/bmjopen-2024-085312f02.jpg

相似文献

1
How does communication affect patient safety? Protocol for a systematic review and logic model.沟通如何影响患者安全?系统评价和逻辑模型方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 27;14(5):e085312. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085312.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Impacts of Communication Type and Quality on Patient Safety Incidents : A Systematic Review.
Ann Intern Med. 2025 May;178(5):687-700. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-02904. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
4
Early interventions for post-traumatic stress following musculoskeletal trauma: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.肌肉骨骼创伤后创伤后应激的早期干预:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 23;12(9):e065590. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065590.
5
Effectiveness of educational interventions to develop patient safety knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes in undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review protocol.教育干预措施在培养本科护生患者安全知识、技能、行为和态度方面的有效性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e058888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058888.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Training programs in communication skills to improve self-efficacy for health personnel: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.旨在提高卫生人员自我效能的沟通技能培训项目:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(33):e16697. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016697.
8
Effectiveness of robotic-assisted therapy for upper extremity function in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review protocol.机器人辅助治疗对脑瘫儿童和青少年上肢功能的有效性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e045051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045051.
9
Pharmacological interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials and non-randomised studies.药物治疗化脓性汗腺炎:随机试验和非随机研究的系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e062351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062351.
10
Immediate and short-term effects of eccentric muscle contractions on structural, morphological, mechanical, functional and physiological properties of peripheral nerves: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.离心肌肉收缩对周围神经结构、形态、力学、功能和生理特性的即时和短期影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0289422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289422. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of Environmental Protectors Against Hospital Work Stress.巴西版医院工作压力环境防护因素的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;13(13):1618. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131618.
2
Patient handover practice of nurses and associated factors in South Wollo Zone Public Hospitals, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南沃洛地区公立医院护士的患者交接实践及相关因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87968-8.
3
Improving Communication and Teamwork Between Resident Doctor Teams Using a Group Messaging Application: A Quality Improvement Project.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventable harm because of outpatient medication errors among children with leukemia and lymphoma: A multisite longitudinal assessment.儿童白血病和淋巴瘤患者因门诊用药错误导致的可预防伤害:一项多地点纵向评估。
Cancer. 2023 Apr 1;129(7):1064-1074. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34651. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Defining healthcare never events to effect system change: A protocol for systematic review.定义医疗“永不事件”以推动系统变革:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0279113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279113. eCollection 2022.
3
Sentinel Events and Miscommunication What do we know in 2021: A Language and Social Psychology Framework.
使用群组消息应用程序改善住院医生团队之间的沟通与协作:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 20;17(1):e77722. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77722. eCollection 2025 Jan.
哨点事件和沟通失误:2021 年我们了解到了什么:语言与社会心理学框架。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(9):1770-1779. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2031451. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application.基层医疗电子报告系统中上报的患者安全事件分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178941.
5
Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines.社论:综述文章、系统评价、Meta分析以及《系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南》更新版
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Aug 23;27:e934475. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934475.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在医疗保健环境中可预防的药物伤害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 6;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01774-9.
8
Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England.英格兰药物错误的流行情况及其临床和经济负担的经济分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):96-105. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.系统评价中不进行荟萃分析的综合 (SWiM):报告指南。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6890.
10
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.