Peach Jennifer M, Laplante Joelle, Boileau Kayla
Department of National Defence, Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2024 May 15;15:1323474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323474. eCollection 2024.
The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are subject to the Employment Equity Act, which requires federally regulated employers to identify and eliminate barriers to the employment of designated groups (women, Indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities (PwD), and racialized members), and establish short-term, numerical goals to address underrepresentation. Addressing employment barriers experienced by these equity seeking groups is one of the CAF's key priorities. The objective of this study is to examine group differences in feelings of inclusion (i.e., relatedness, organizational inclusion, and microaggressions) and retention-related measures (i.e., job satisfaction, affective commitment, and intentions to leave), the contribution of feelings of inclusion to retention measures, and the effect of numerical representation and number of marginalized identities on these concepts. We analyzed data from the 2022 Your Say Matters survey, which was administered to a representative sample of CAF members, with oversampling of under-represented groups. Respondents included 4,483 Regular Force members (30.9% response rate). The groups under study included Indigenous members, persons with disabilities, racialized members, women not part of another group (non-Indigenous, non-racialized, women without disabilities), and everyone else (non-Indigenous, non-racialized, not women, without disabilities). Our hypotheses were supported overall, such that groups with less representation in the CAF scored lower on inclusion measures than groups with more representation. The number of marginalized identities held by military members predicted the inclusion measures, but did not predict retention-related measures. There were some group differences on retention-related measures, such that women not part of another group scored more favorably than other designated groups, and racialized members scored more favorably than PwD and Indigenous members. Inclusion measures predicted job satisfaction, affective commitment, and intentions to leave equally for all groups studied, suggesting that feeling included is important for all.
加拿大武装部队(CAF)受《就业公平法》约束,该法案要求联邦监管的雇主识别并消除指定群体(女性、原住民、残疾人以及少数族裔成员)就业的障碍,并设定短期的量化目标以解决代表性不足的问题。解决这些寻求公平群体所面临的就业障碍是加拿大武装部队的关键优先事项之一。本研究的目的是考察包容感(即归属感、组织包容感和微侵犯)和留任意向相关指标(即工作满意度、情感承诺和离职意向)的群体差异,包容感对留任意向相关指标的贡献,以及人数代表性和边缘化身份数量对这些概念的影响。我们分析了2022年“你的意见很重要”调查的数据,该调查针对加拿大武装部队成员的代表性样本进行,对代表性不足的群体进行了过度抽样。受访者包括4483名正规部队成员(回复率为30.9%)。所研究的群体包括原住民成员、残疾人、少数族裔成员、不属于其他群体的女性(非原住民、非少数族裔、非残疾女性)以及其他所有人(非原住民、非少数族裔、非女性、非残疾)。我们的假设总体上得到了支持,即在加拿大武装部队中代表性较低的群体在包容感指标上的得分低于代表性较高的群体。军人拥有的边缘化身份数量可预测包容感指标,但无法预测留任意向相关指标。在留任意向相关指标上存在一些群体差异,即不属于其他群体的女性得分优于其他指定群体,少数族裔成员得分优于残疾人和原住民成员。对于所有研究的群体,包容感指标对工作满意度、情感承诺和离职意向的预测作用相同,这表明被接纳的感觉对所有人都很重要。