• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在职业足球中,谁是最好的传球手?一种用于对不同难度级别传球进行分类并区分最佳传球手的机器学习方法。

Who are the best passing players in professional soccer? A machine learning approach for classifying passes with different levels of difficulty and discriminating the best passing players.

机构信息

School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Faculty of São Vicente, São Vicente, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0304139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304139. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304139
PMID:38814958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11139314/
Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the use of technical-tactical variables and machine learning (ML) classifiers in the automatic classification of the passing difficulty (DP) level in soccer matches and to illustrate the use of the model with the best performance to distinguish the best passing players. We compared eight ML classifiers according to their accuracy performance in classifying passing events using 35 technical-tactical variables based on spatiotemporal data. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.70 ± 0.04%, considering a multi-class classification. Next, we illustrate the use of the best-performing classifier in the assessment of players. In our study, 2,522 pass actions were classified by the SVM algorithm as low (53.9%), medium (23.6%), and high difficulty passes (22.5%). Furthermore, we used successful rates in low-DP, medium-DP, and high-DP as inputs for principal component analysis (PCA). The first principal component (PC1) showed a higher correlation with high-DP (0.80), followed by medium-DP (0.73), and low-DP accuracy (0.24). The PC1 scores were used to rank the best passing players. This information can be a very rich performance indication by ranking the best passing players and teams and can be applied in offensive sequences analysis and talent identification.

摘要

本研究旨在评估技术战术变量和机器学习 (ML) 分类器在足球比赛中自动分类传球难度 (DP) 水平的应用,并通过使用性能最佳的模型来说明如何区分最佳传球球员。我们根据基于时空数据的 35 个技术战术变量,比较了 8 种 ML 分类器在传球事件分类中的准确性表现。支持向量机 (SVM) 算法在多类分类中实现了 0.70±0.04%的平衡准确率。接下来,我们说明了使用性能最佳的分类器来评估球员的方法。在我们的研究中,2522 次传球动作被 SVM 算法分类为低难度(53.9%)、中难度(23.6%)和高难度(22.5%)传球。此外,我们使用低 DP、中 DP 和高 DP 的成功率作为主成分分析(PCA)的输入。第一主成分(PC1)与高 DP 的相关性更高(0.80),其次是中 DP(0.73)和低 DP 准确率(0.24)。PC1 得分用于对最佳传球球员进行排名。通过对最佳传球球员和球队进行排名,这一信息可以提供非常丰富的表现指标,并可应用于进攻序列分析和人才识别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/9cc9909189fb/pone.0304139.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/30e0e869fb68/pone.0304139.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/2a0a5560400c/pone.0304139.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/b7855dc0f091/pone.0304139.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/b6f6116661fc/pone.0304139.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/9cc9909189fb/pone.0304139.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/30e0e869fb68/pone.0304139.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/2a0a5560400c/pone.0304139.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/b7855dc0f091/pone.0304139.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/b6f6116661fc/pone.0304139.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66be/11139314/9cc9909189fb/pone.0304139.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Who are the best passing players in professional soccer? A machine learning approach for classifying passes with different levels of difficulty and discriminating the best passing players.在职业足球中,谁是最好的传球手?一种用于对不同难度级别传球进行分类并区分最佳传球手的机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0304139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304139. eCollection 2024.
2
Classification and determinants of passing difficulty in soccer: a multivariate approach.足球射门难度的分类和决定因素:一种多变量方法。
Sci Med Footb. 2022 Nov;6(4):483-493. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2021.1986227. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
A risk-reward assessment of passing decisions: comparison between positional roles using tracking data from professional men's soccer.传球决策的风险-收益评估:基于职业男子足球追踪数据的位置角色比较。
Sci Med Footb. 2022 Aug;6(3):372-380. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2021.1944660. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
4
Augmented-Feedback Training Improves Cognitive Motor Performance of Soccer Players.增强反馈训练提高足球运动员的认知运动表现。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jan;52(1):141-152. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002118.
5
How spatial constraints afford successful and unsuccessful penetrative passes in elite association football.空间限制如何影响精英足球比赛中渗透性传球的成功与失败
Sci Med Footb. 2023 May;7(2):157-164. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2022.2060519. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Sustained Passing Performance of Elite and Subelite Female Soccer Players Following a Female Match-Specific Exercise Protocol.精英和次精英女子足球运动员在完成一项女子专项运动方案后的持续传球表现。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):504-510. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0082. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Not Every Pass Can Be an Assist: A Data-Driven Model to Measure Pass Effectiveness in Professional Soccer Matches.并非每一次传球都能成为助攻:一种用于测量职业足球比赛中传球有效性的数据驱动模型。
Big Data. 2019 Mar;7(1):57-70. doi: 10.1089/big.2018.0067. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Differences in playing style and technical performance according to the team ranking in the Spanish football LaLiga. A thirteen seasons study.根据西班牙足球甲级联赛的球队排名,研究了 13 个赛季,分析了比赛风格和技术表现的差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0293095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293095. eCollection 2023.
9
The effect of bio-banding on academy soccer player passing networks: Implications of relative pitch size.生物带宽对学院足球运动员传球网络的影响:相对音高大小的启示。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260867. eCollection 2021.
10
Technical and physical determinants of soccer match-play performance in elite youth soccer players.精英青少年足球运动员足球比赛表现的技术和身体决定因素。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Apr;57(4):369-379. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06093-X. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning application in soccer: a systematic review.机器学习在足球中的应用:一项系统综述。
Biol Sport. 2023 Jan;40(1):249-263. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.112970. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Using multiple machine learning algorithms to classify elite and sub-elite goalkeepers in professional men's football.运用多种机器学习算法对职业男子足球中的精英和次精英守门员进行分类。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 22;11(1):22703. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01187-5.
3
Unlocking the potential of big data to support tactical performance analysis in professional soccer: A systematic review.
大数据在支持职业足球战术表现分析中的应用潜力:系统评价。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Apr;21(4):481-496. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1747552. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
Analytics in Sports Medicine: Implications and Responsibilities That Accompany the Era of Big Data.运动医学中的分析方法:大数据时代的影响与责任
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):276-283. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01601.
5
Learning to Rate Player Positioning in Soccer.学习评估足球运动员的场上位置。
Big Data. 2019 Mar;7(1):71-82. doi: 10.1089/big.2018.0054. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
6
Not Every Pass Can Be an Assist: A Data-Driven Model to Measure Pass Effectiveness in Professional Soccer Matches.并非每一次传球都能成为助攻:一种用于测量职业足球比赛中传球有效性的数据驱动模型。
Big Data. 2019 Mar;7(1):57-70. doi: 10.1089/big.2018.0067. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
7
"Which pass is better?" Novel approaches to assess passing effectiveness in elite soccer.“哪种传球更好?”评估精英足球传球有效性的新方法。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Oct;55:172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Big data and tactical analysis in elite soccer: future challenges and opportunities for sports science.精英足球中的大数据与战术分析:体育科学面临的未来挑战与机遇
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 24;5(1):1410. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3108-2. eCollection 2016.
9
Analysis of the distances covered by first division brazilian soccer players obtained with an automatic tracking method.分析用自动跟踪方法获得的巴西甲级足球运动员的跑动距离。
J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Jun 1;6(2):233-42. eCollection 2007.
10
Evolution of World Cup soccer final games 1966-2010: game structure, speed and play patterns.1966 - 2010年世界杯足球决赛的演变:比赛结构、速度和比赛模式
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Mar;17(2):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 May 2.