Rodrigues Freitas Gabiana, Capitanio Bárbara Luzia, Weissheimer Theodoro, Barcelos Só Bruna, Silva Emmanuel João, Martins Manoela Domingues, Rosa Ricardo Abreu Da, So Marcus Vinicius Reis
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Eur Endod J. 2025 Mar 21;10(2):94-103. doi: 10.14744/eej.2024.98700. Epub 2024 May 30.
Assessing scientific literature about prevalence of periapical lesions in individuals with osteoporosis in comparison to those without osteoporosis. Systematic searches were conducted up to November 24th, 2023 in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Grey Literature Reports databases. Only observational studies were included. The ROBINS-E tool, a revised Cochrane instrument for assessing bias in nonrandomized exposure studies, was employed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was utilized to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. From 484 studies, three were included. One of them was categorized as having an exceptionally high risk of bias, while two were deemed to have certain concerns. Two studies reported that osteoporotic patients may have more chances to present a periapical lesion compared to non-osteoporotic patients. One study reported no differences between groups. The GRADE analysis indicated a markedly low level of certainty in the evidence. The present review indicates that osteoporotic patients may present more periapical lesions compared to non-osteoporotic patients. This statement should be cautiously interpreted and further well-designed studies are needed. (EEJ-2023-09-123).
评估有关骨质疏松症患者与非骨质疏松症患者根尖周病变患病率的科学文献。截至2023年11月24日,在Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、MEDLINE/PubMed、SCOPUS、科学网和灰色文献报告数据库中进行了系统检索。仅纳入观察性研究。采用了ROBINS-E工具,这是一种经修订的Cochrane工具,用于评估非随机暴露研究中的偏倚。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)工具来评估证据的确定性。从484项研究中,纳入了3项。其中1项被归类为具有极高的偏倚风险,而2项被认为存在一定问题。两项研究报告称,与非骨质疏松症患者相比,骨质疏松症患者出现根尖周病变的可能性可能更大。一项研究报告两组之间无差异。GRADE分析表明证据的确定性水平极低。本综述表明,与非骨质疏松症患者相比,骨质疏松症患者可能出现更多根尖周病变。这一说法应谨慎解读,需要进一步开展设计良好的研究。(EEJ - 2023 - 09 - 123)