Analysis of Hybrid Feature Optimization Techniques Based on the Classification Accuracy of Brain Tumor Regions Using Machine Learning and Further Evaluation Based on the Institute Test Data.

AIM

The goal of this study was to get optimal brain tumor features from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and classify them based on the three groups of the tumor region: Peritumoral edema, enhancing-core, and necrotic tumor core, using machine learning classification models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study's dataset was obtained from the multimodal brain tumor segmentation challenge. A total of 599 brain MRI studies were employed, all in neuroimaging informatics technology initiative format. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and testing subsets online test dataset (OTD). The dataset includes four types of MRI series, which were combined together and processed for intensity normalization using contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization methodology. To extract radiomics features, a python-based library called pyRadiomics was employed. Particle-swarm optimization (PSO) with varying inertia weights was used for feature optimization. Inertia weight with a linearly decreasing strategy (W1), inertia weight with a nonlinear coefficient decreasing strategy (W2), and inertia weight with a logarithmic strategy (W3) were different strategies used to vary the inertia weight for feature optimization in PSO. These selected features were further optimized using the principal component analysis (PCA) method to further reducing the dimensionality and removing the noise and improve the performance and efficiency of subsequent algorithms. Support vector machine (SVM), light gradient boosting (LGB), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) machine learning classification algorithms were utilized for the classification of images into different tumor regions using optimized features. The proposed method was also tested on institute test data (ITD) for a total of 30 patient images.

RESULTS

For OTD test dataset, the classification accuracy of SVM was 0.989, for the LGB model (LGBM) was 0.992, and for the XGB model (XGBM) was 0.994, using the varying inertia weight-PSO optimization method and the classification accuracy of SVM was 0.996 for the LGBM was 0.998, and for the XGBM was 0.994, using PSO and PCA-a hybrid optimization technique. For ITD test dataset, the classification accuracy of SVM was 0.994 for the LGBM was 0.993, and for the XGBM was 0.997, using the hybrid optimization technique.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the proposed method can be used to classify a brain tumor as used in this study to classify the tumor region into three groups: Peritumoral edema, enhancing-core, and necrotic tumor core. This was done by extracting the different features of the tumor, such as its shape, grey level, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, etc., and then choosing the best features using hybrid optimal feature selection techniques. This was done without much human expertise and in much less time than it would take a person.