Gray-Donald K, Kramer M S, Munday S, Leduc D G
Pediatrics. 1985 Mar;75(3):514-8.
To avoid methodologic pitfalls in previous observational studies linking formula supplementation in the hospital to early discontinuation of breast-feeding, a controlled clinical trial of restricted supplementation was conducted. In a pretrial sample of 621 newborns, a comparison of two "well-baby" nurseries found no differences in either hospital supplementation practices or the proportion of infants still being breast-fed at 4 or 9 weeks postpartum. Restriction of supplementation in one of the nurseries for the trial period (n = 781) did not result in higher breast-feeding rates at 4 or 9 weeks. There was, however, a slightly greater mean percent of birth weight lost in the restricted group (6.0% v 5.1%; P less than .001). In examining the control group for evidence of an "observational" association, it was found that infants still breast-feeding at 4 or 9 weeks were far more likely to have been unsupplemented than those no longer being breast-fed. It thus appears that formula supplementation in the hospital is a marker, rather than a cause, of breast-feeding difficulty.
为避免以往观察性研究中在医院进行配方奶补充与早期停止母乳喂养之间存在的方法学缺陷,开展了一项关于限制补充配方奶的对照临床试验。在621名新生儿的预试验样本中,对两个“健康婴儿”托儿所进行比较,发现医院补充配方奶的做法以及产后4周或9周时仍进行母乳喂养的婴儿比例均无差异。在试验期间,对其中一个托儿所的补充配方奶进行限制(n = 781),并未导致4周或9周时的母乳喂养率更高。然而,限制组的出生体重平均丢失百分比略高(6.0%对5.1%;P < 0.001)。在检查对照组以寻找“观察性”关联的证据时发现,4周或9周时仍进行母乳喂养的婴儿未补充配方奶的可能性远高于不再进行母乳喂养的婴儿。因此,医院中的配方奶补充似乎是母乳喂养困难的一个标志,而非原因。