Gondek D, Vandecasteele L, Sánchez-Mira N, Steinmetz S, Mehmeti T, Voorpostel M
FORS Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences, c/o Université de Lausanne, room 5893, Géopolis, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute of Social Sciences (ISS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jun 6;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00760-w.
The key objective of our study was to describe the population-average trajectories of wellbeing, spanning the period of 2017-2022, comparing young people with other age groups. Moreover, we aimed to identify subgroups of young people who experienced disproportionate changes in wellbeing.
We used longitudinal data from six waves (2017-2022) of the Swiss Household Panel. Participants were at least 14 years old in 2017 and had at least one valid composite measure of wellbeing between 2017 and 2022 (n individuals = 11,224; n observations = 49,032). The data were typically collected with telephone or web interviewing. The age of participants ranged from 14 to 102, with a roughly equal distribution of men (51.1%) and women (48.9%). We conceptualized wellbeing as positive affect and life satisfaction, negative affect, stress and psychosomatic symptoms. We described the trajectories of wellbeing using piecewise growth curve analysis. We included sociodemographic characteristics to further describe wellbeing trajectories across subgroups of young people. These comprised (1) gender, (2) migration status, (3) partnership status, (4) living with parents, (5) education/employment status, (6) household income.
Young people (age 14-25) experienced a steady decline in positive affect and life satisfaction throughout the entire period, with the greatest change occurring before the pandemic (2017-2019). The trajectories in this outcome were largely stable in other age groups. Moreover, young individuals showed a more pronounced increase in negative affect, particularly in the pre-pandemic years, compared to older groups. Negative affect increased during the pandemic, followed by a subsequent decline post-pandemic, observed similarly across all age groups. Among young people specifically, the trajectory of stress was similar to the one of negative affect. However, issues such as sleep problems, weakness, weariness, and headaches continued to increase in this population from 2017 to 2022. We also found evidence for a greater increase in negative affect during the pandemic in young women and those not in employment or education.
Given the fact that the decline in young people's wellbeing in Switzerland started two years before the pandemic, our study emphasises the importance of consideing their wellbeing within a broader systemic context beyond pandemic-related changes.
我们研究的主要目的是描述2017年至2022年期间幸福感的总体平均轨迹,并将年轻人与其他年龄组进行比较。此外,我们旨在确定幸福感变化不成比例的年轻人群体。
我们使用了瑞士家庭小组六轮(2017 - 2022年)的纵向数据。参与者在2017年至少14岁,且在2017年至2022年期间至少有一项有效的综合幸福感测量值(个体数 = 11224;观测数 = 49032)。数据通常通过电话或网络访谈收集。参与者年龄在14岁至102岁之间,男性(51.1%)和女性(48.9%)分布大致相等。我们将幸福感概念化为积极情绪和生活满意度、消极情绪、压力和身心症状。我们使用分段增长曲线分析来描述幸福感轨迹。我们纳入了社会人口学特征,以进一步描述不同年轻人群体的幸福感轨迹。这些特征包括:(1)性别,(2)移民身份,(3)伴侣关系状况,(4)与父母同住情况,(5)教育/就业状况,(6)家庭收入。
年轻人(14 - 25岁)在整个期间积极情绪和生活满意度稳步下降,最大变化发生在疫情之前(2017 - 2019年)。这一结果的轨迹在其他年龄组中基本稳定。此外,与年长组相比,年轻人消极情绪的增加更为明显,尤其是在疫情前的几年。消极情绪在疫情期间增加,随后在疫情后下降,所有年龄组均呈现类似情况。具体而言,在年轻人中,压力轨迹与消极情绪轨迹相似。然而,从2017年到2022年,该人群中的睡眠问题、虚弱、疲倦和头痛等问题持续增加。我们还发现有证据表明,年轻女性以及未就业或未接受教育的人群在疫情期间消极情绪增加幅度更大。
鉴于瑞士年轻人的幸福感下降在疫情爆发前两年就已开始,我们的研究强调了在更广泛的系统背景下考虑他们的幸福感的重要性,而不仅仅局限于与疫情相关的变化。