• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我伤害的障碍与促进因素:一种面向卫生专业人员的工具的开发与验证

Barriers and facilitators for self-harm: development and validation of an instrument for health professionals.

作者信息

Vanzela Amanda Sarah, Silva Aline Conceição, Pedrollo Laysa Fernanda Silva, Martin Isabela Dos Santos, Vedana Kelly Graziani Giacchero

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Scholarship holder at the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2025 Aug 18;33:e4638. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7754.4638. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.7754.4638
PMID:40834129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364452/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

to develop and validate an instrument based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by health professionals in the prevention of self-harm. methodological study based on Pasquali's theoretical framework and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Face and content validations were performed through expert evaluation (n = 13) and construct validity, with health professionals (n = 91). Participants were selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Data were collected on a virtual form and analyzed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), the First-Order Agreement (AC1) coefficient of concordance, and Horn's exploratory factor analysis. inter-rater agreement was considered moderate (AC1 = 0.52; SD = 0.04; 95% CI = 0.42 - 0.61; p = ≤ 0.005). After analysis with the target audience, three items were removed (KMO = < 0.6). Factor analysis identified three factors and 11 items, with the internal consistency of the instrument considered high (ω = 0.89). The final version was structured with 11 items on a Likert scale. the instrument is pioneering and accessible for the Brazilian context, with potential to identify barriers and facilitators self-harm prevention.

BACKGROUND

(1) The instrument identifies barriers and facilitators for the prevention of self-harm.

BACKGROUND

(2) The internal consistency of the instrument was considered high.

BACKGROUND

(3) The analysis identified the following factors: knowledge and capacity, context and institutional support.

BACKGROUND

(4) The instrument developed is easy to use and adaptable to different contexts in Brazil.

BACKGROUND

(5) The instrument contributes to studies on the prevention of self-harm.

摘要

未标注

基于理论领域框架(TDF)开发并验证一种工具,以识别卫生专业人员在预防自我伤害方面所感知到的障碍和促进因素。基于帕斯夸利理论框架和理论领域框架的方法学研究。通过专家评估(n = 13)进行了表面效度和内容效度验证,并对91名卫生专业人员进行了结构效度验证。参与者通过非概率便利抽样选取。数据通过虚拟表格收集,并使用内容效度指数(CVI)、一阶一致性(AC1)协调系数和霍恩探索性因素分析进行分析。评分者间一致性被认为中等(AC1 = 0.52;标准差 = 0.04;95%置信区间 = 0.42 - 0.61;p = ≤ 0.005)。在与目标受众进行分析后,删除了三个项目(KMO = < 0.6)。因素分析确定了三个因素和11个项目,该工具的内部一致性被认为较高(ω = 0.89)。最终版本由11个李克特量表项目构成。该工具在巴西背景下具有开创性且易于使用,有潜力识别预防自我伤害的障碍和促进因素。

背景

(1)该工具识别预防自我伤害的障碍和促进因素。

背景

(2)该工具的内部一致性被认为较高。

背景

(3)分析确定了以下因素:知识与能力、背景与机构支持。

背景

(4)所开发的工具易于使用且适用于巴西的不同背景。

背景

(5)该工具有助于自我伤害预防研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/a330d8b620f7/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1-es.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/bdb25404845c/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/139301576a5c/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1-pt.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/a330d8b620f7/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1-es.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/bdb25404845c/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/139301576a5c/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1-pt.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/12364452/a330d8b620f7/1518-8345-rlae-33-e4638-f1-es.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for self-harm: development and validation of an instrument for health professionals.自我伤害的障碍与促进因素:一种面向卫生专业人员的工具的开发与验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2025 Aug 18;33:e4638. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7754.4638. eCollection 2025.
2
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Development of an instrument for screening mental health based on Ayurvedic concept of Triguna.基于阿育吠陀三德概念的心理健康筛查工具的开发。
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2025 Aug 6;16(5):101175. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2025.101175.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Develop and Psychometric Testing an Instrument to Evaluate the Management of Digital Competence Sharing in Healthcare.开发并进行心理测量测试一种用于评估医疗保健中数字能力共享管理的工具。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 3;2025:9906301. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9906301. eCollection 2025.
7
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
8
Validation of the Perceived Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence (PEDIA) Scale Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender and Nonbinary Persons: Cross-Sectional Study.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性关系者、跨性别者和非二元性别者中抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性感知障碍量表(PEDIA)的验证:横断面研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jun 27;11:e67005. doi: 10.2196/67005.
9
Development and validation of the health belief model scale for early childhood caries prevention behaviors of parents.家长幼儿龋病预防行为健康信念模型量表的编制与验证
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1051. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06416-1.
10
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of suicide risk management strategies in primary care settings.基层医疗环境中自杀风险管理策略的系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 2;15:1440738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1440738. eCollection 2024.
2
Implementation of Complex Suicide Prevention Interventions: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Lessons Learned.复杂自杀预防干预措施的实施:对障碍、促进因素及经验教训的见解
Arch Suicide Res. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2):556-579. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2368127. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.
报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 2024 年 OMIs 版。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111422. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111422. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Development and validation of a theory-based questionnaire examining barriers and facilitators to discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist use.开发并验证了一个基于理论的问卷,用于调查长期苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂使用中断的障碍和促进因素。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
5
Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review.自杀预防干预措施实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Mar 13;10:e15. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.9. eCollection 2023.
6
Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review.识别医院中成功实施计算机临床决策支持系统的障碍和促进因素:一个基于 NASSS 框架的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Jul 26;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01287-y.
7
Using the theoretical domains framework to explore behavioural determinants for medication taking in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.运用理论领域框架探索经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者服药行为的决定因素。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Apr 10;31(2):190-197. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riac039.
8
Healthcare professionals' perspective on delivering personalised and holistic care: using the Theoretical Domains Framework.医疗保健专业人员提供个性化和整体护理的观点:使用理论领域框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07630-1.
9
Suicide Attempts and Suicide in Brazil: An Epidemiological Analysis.巴西的自杀未遂与自杀:一项流行病学分析。
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2021 Oct;29(3):294-302. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2021.21035.
10
Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice: Research Collaboration and the Perception of Research Findings.弥合科学与实践之间的差距:研究合作与对研究结果的认知
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:790451. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790451. eCollection 2021.