Meyer M P, Amortegui A J
Genitourin Med. 1987 Feb;63(1):22-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.63.1.22.
IgG antibody titres against Chlamydia trachomatis were measured using a whole inclusion assay (Electro-Nucleonics Laboratories, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) in single serum samples of patients who presented for termination of pregnancy with evidence of infection with this organism (case group) and of 30 women with no evidence of infection (control group). Case and control patients were matched for age, race, marital status, history of sexually transmitted diseases, number of lifetime sexual partners, and whether they had had a new sexual partner in the preceding month. Fifty eight of 60 (97%) serum samples tested had chlamydial antibodies present at a titre of 1/8 or more. There was no significant difference between the geometric mean titres of the 30 case patients and the 28 controls with chlamydial antibodies (1/161.3 and 1/77.4 respectively). Significantly more case patients than controls, however, had a titre of 1/128 or more (p less than 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of a single serum antibody titre of 1/128 or more as an indicator of recent infection compared with isolation of the organism in cycloheximide treated McCoy cells or antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme (Abbot Laboratories; North Chicago, Illinois, USA), or both, were each 67%. The value of the antibody assay seems to be questionable as high levels of antibodies failed to correlate with isolation or antigen detection results, or both, in our population.
采用全包涵体检测法(美国马里兰州贝塞斯达市电子核子学实验室),对有沙眼衣原体感染证据前来终止妊娠的患者单份血清样本(病例组)以及30名无感染证据的女性(对照组)进行了抗沙眼衣原体IgG抗体滴度检测。病例组和对照组患者在年龄、种族、婚姻状况、性传播疾病史、终身性伴侣数量以及前一个月是否有新的性伴侣等方面进行了匹配。60份检测的血清样本中有58份(97%)衣原体抗体滴度为1/8或更高。30例有衣原体抗体的病例患者与28例对照患者的几何平均滴度之间无显著差异(分别为1/161.3和1/77.4)。然而,病例患者中抗体滴度为1/128或更高的比例显著高于对照组(p小于0.01)。与在经放线菌酮处理的 McCoy 细胞中分离病原体或采用衣原体酶法(美国伊利诺伊州北芝加哥市雅培实验室)进行抗原检测,或两者同时进行相比,单份血清抗体滴度为1/128或更高作为近期感染指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均为67%。在我们的研究人群中,由于高水平抗体与病原体分离或抗原检测结果或两者均不相关,抗体检测的价值似乎值得怀疑。