Barnes P R, Williams C B, Davies R L, Childs C S, Hedges A, Graham D
Postgrad Med J. 1985 Mar;61(713):221-4. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.61.713.221.
A double blind study comparing intravenous pethidine and meptazinol has been performed to establish the efficacy and safety of meptazinol as an analgesic agent in colonoscopy. Twenty two patients received pethidine and 23 patients received meptazinol and no difference in analgesic effect or sedative effect could be demonstrated either by observer or patient assessment using a visual analogue scale. A group of 10 patients in the pethidine group and 9 in the meptazinol group had continuous recording of electrocardiogram, pulse rate and blood pressure throughout the procedure. Significant falls in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were recorded in the pethidine group but not the meptazinol group. Benign cardiac arrhythmias were recorded in both groups before and after the administration of premedicant drug and 1 patient in each group had transient ST depression. Side effects were recorded with equal frequency in each group except for vomiting which occurred in 5 of 23 meptazinol patients but none of the pethidine patients. Meptazinol is an effective analgesic drug in colonoscopy which produces less cardiovascular depression than pethidine and thus may be useful in selected patients especially the elderly or those with known cardiovascular disease.
已进行一项双盲研究,比较静脉注射哌替啶和美普他酚,以确定美普他酚作为结肠镜检查镇痛剂的疗效和安全性。22例患者接受哌替啶,23例患者接受美普他酚,无论是观察者还是患者使用视觉模拟量表评估,均未发现镇痛效果或镇静效果存在差异。哌替啶组的10例患者和美普他酚组的9例患者在整个检查过程中持续记录心电图、脉搏率和血压。哌替啶组记录到收缩压和舒张压均显著下降,而美普他酚组未出现这种情况。两组在给予术前用药前后均记录到良性心律失常,每组各有1例患者出现短暂性ST段压低。除呕吐外,两组副作用的发生频率相同,23例美普他酚患者中有5例出现呕吐,而哌替啶患者中无一例出现呕吐。美普他酚是结肠镜检查中一种有效的镇痛药物,其引起的心血管抑制比哌替啶少,因此可能对特定患者有用,尤其是老年人或患有已知心血管疾病的患者。