Harmer M, Slattery P J, Rosen M, Vickers M D
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Feb 26;286(6366):680-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6366.680.
An on demand intramuscular analgesic system using the Cardiff Palliator was tested. Forty consenting patients were studied after cholecystectomy in a double blind trial using increments of buprenorphine (0.15 mg), meptazinol (50 mg), morphine (5 mg), and pethidine (50 mg). Most patients attained good levels of pain relief (mean analogue pain score 36.5), comparable to intravenous on demand analgesia. There were no technical complications. Significant differences were found between drugs in dizziness (pethidine produced the worst score) but not with other side effects. Buprenorphine produced longer lasting analgesia than meptazinol or pethidine and also gave the lowest pain scores. Patterns of analgesic consumption were the same as with intravenous on demand systems, but larger amounts of drug were generally used. Relative analgesic potencies derived from drug consumption rates were also consistent with those from intravenous on demand studies. An on demand intramuscular analgesic system offers a simple but effective means of relieving severe postoperative pain.
对一种使用加的夫镇痛泵的按需肌内注射镇痛系统进行了测试。在一项双盲试验中,对40名同意参与的患者在胆囊切除术后使用递增剂量的丁丙诺啡(0.15毫克)、美普他酚(50毫克)、吗啡(5毫克)和哌替啶(50毫克)进行了研究。大多数患者获得了良好的疼痛缓解水平(平均视觉模拟疼痛评分36.5),与静脉按需镇痛相当。没有技术并发症。在头晕方面发现药物之间存在显著差异(哌替啶得分最差),但在其他副作用方面没有差异。丁丙诺啡产生的镇痛作用比美普他酚或哌替啶更持久,并且疼痛评分也最低。镇痛药物的使用模式与静脉按需系统相同,但通常使用的药物量更大。从药物消耗率得出的相对镇痛效力也与静脉按需研究的结果一致。按需肌内注射镇痛系统提供了一种简单但有效的缓解严重术后疼痛的方法。