Flint J P, Welstead M, Cox S R, Russ T C, Marshall A, Luciano M
Advanced Care Research Centre School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
medRxiv. 2024 May 31:2024.05.31.24308260. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.31.24308260.
Frailty is a complex trait. Twin studies and recent Genome-Wide Association Studies have demonstrated a strong genetic basis of frailty but there remains a lack of genetic studies exploring genetic prediction of Frailty. Previous work has shown that a single polygenic predictor - represented by a Frailty polygenic score - predicts Frailty, measured via the frailty index, in independent samples within the United Kingdom. We extended this work, using a multi-polygenic score (MPS) approach to increase predictive power. Predictor variables - twenty-six polygenic scores (PGS) were modelled in regularised Elastic net regression models, with repeated cross-validation, to estimate joint prediction of the polygenic scores and order the predictions by their contributing strength to Frailty in two independent cohorts aged 65+ - the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936). Results showed that the MPS explained 3.6% and 4.7% of variance compared to the best single-score prediction of 2.6% and 2.2% of variance in ELSA and LBC1936 respectively. The strongest polygenic predictors of worsening frailty came from PGS for Chronic pain, Frailty and Waist circumference; whilst PGS for Parental Death, Educational attainment, and Rheumatoid Arthritis were found to be protective to frailty. Results from the predictors remaining in the final model were then validated using the longitudinal LBC1936, with equivalent PGS scores from the same GWAS summary statistics. Thus, this MPS approach provides new evidence for the genetic contributions to frailty in later life and sheds light on the complex structure of the Frailty Index measurement.
衰弱是一种复杂的特质。双胞胎研究和近期的全基因组关联研究已证明衰弱具有强大的遗传基础,但仍缺乏探索衰弱遗传预测的基因研究。先前的研究表明,一个单一的多基因预测指标——以衰弱多基因评分来表示——能够预测在英国独立样本中通过衰弱指数衡量的衰弱情况。我们扩展了这项工作,采用多基因评分(MPS)方法来提高预测能力。预测变量——二十六个多基因评分(PGS)在正则化弹性网回归模型中进行建模,并通过重复交叉验证,以估计多基因评分的联合预测,并根据它们对65岁及以上两个独立队列——英国老年纵向研究(ELSA)和1936年洛锡安出生队列(LBC1936)中衰弱的贡献强度对预测进行排序。结果表明,在ELSA和LBC1936中,MPS分别解释了3.6%和4.7%的方差,而最佳单评分预测分别解释了2.6%和2.2%的方差。衰弱恶化最强的多基因预测指标来自慢性疼痛、衰弱和腰围的PGS;而父母死亡、教育程度和类风湿性关节炎的PGS被发现对衰弱有保护作用。然后,使用纵向的LBC1936对最终模型中保留的预测指标的结果进行验证,使用来自相同全基因组关联研究汇总统计数据的等效PGS评分。因此,这种MPS方法为晚年衰弱中的遗传贡献提供了新证据,并揭示了衰弱指数测量的复杂结构。