• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地位的本质:探索概念化和衡量地位的多样方法。

The nature of status: Navigating the varied approaches to conceptualizing and measuring status.

作者信息

Xu Tianyue, Evans M Blair, Benson Alex J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Organ Psychol Rev. 2024 May;14(2):204-237. doi: 10.1177/20413866231220505. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1177/20413866231220505
PMID:38855652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11161331/
Abstract

Members of small groups fundamentally desire status as status underpins members' self-concept and dictates behavior in groups. Moreover, group members readily orient and update status perceptions that index the social standing of themselves and other members. Yet, our understanding is obscured by variability in how researchers study status. In the current review, we crystallize knowledge regarding the nature of status by characterizing variability in definitions, measures, and analytic frameworks. We advocate a definition of status that draws together attributes of respect, admiration, and voluntary deference. We also distinguish reputational and relational status operationalizations and address implications pertaining to measurement along with downstream decisions involving data management and analysis. We encourage a deliberate approach to ensure congruency in how status is defined, measured, and analyzed within a research program. This review also guides theory and hypothesis generation regarding how status-related processes may vary based on different forms of status or differing contexts.

摘要

小群体成员从根本上渴望地位,因为地位支撑着成员的自我概念并支配着群体中的行为。此外,群体成员很容易确定并更新反映自身和其他成员社会地位的地位认知。然而,研究人员对地位的研究方式存在差异,这使我们的理解变得模糊。在当前的综述中,我们通过描述定义、测量方法和分析框架的差异,梳理了有关地位本质的知识。我们提倡一种将尊重、钦佩和自愿顺从等属性结合在一起的地位定义。我们还区分了声誉地位和关系地位的操作化,并讨论了测量的影响以及涉及数据管理和分析的下游决策。我们鼓励采取审慎的方法,以确保在一个研究项目中对地位的定义、测量和分析方式保持一致。本综述还指导了关于与地位相关的过程如何因不同形式的地位或不同背景而有所变化的理论和假设生成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f0/11161331/3098ddb1da56/10.1177_20413866231220505-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f0/11161331/3098ddb1da56/10.1177_20413866231220505-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f0/11161331/3098ddb1da56/10.1177_20413866231220505-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The nature of status: Navigating the varied approaches to conceptualizing and measuring status.地位的本质:探索概念化和衡量地位的多样方法。
Organ Psychol Rev. 2024 May;14(2):204-237. doi: 10.1177/20413866231220505. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Body Image Distortion (Archived)身体意象扭曲(存档)
8
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.追求地位是人类的基本动机吗?对实证文献的回顾。
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):574-601. doi: 10.1037/a0038781. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit.自恋的“为什么”和“如何”:自恋状态追求的过程模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):150-172. doi: 10.1177/1745691619873350. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
A trajectories based perspective on status dynamics.基于轨迹的地位动态视角。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:233-237. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
3
Knowing where others stand: Accuracy and performance effects of individuals' perceived status hierarchies.了解他人的立场:个体感知到的地位层级对准确性和表现的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;119(1):159-184. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000216. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
How affect shapes status: distinct emotional experiences and expressions facilitate social hierarchy navigation.情绪表达和体验如何影响地位:鲜明的情绪体验和表达有助于社会阶层的导航。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Prestige in a large-scale social group predicts longitudinal changes in testosterone.在一个大规模的社会群体中,威望预测了睾丸激素的纵向变化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jun;114(6):924-944. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000126.
7
Is self-regard a sociometer or a hierometer? Self-esteem tracks status and inclusion, narcissism tracks status.自我关注是社会计量器还是等级计量器?自尊跟踪地位和包容,自恋跟踪地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Mar;116(3):444-466. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000189. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration.为什么和何时层级结构会影响团队有效性:元分析综合。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jun;103(6):591-613. doi: 10.1037/apl0000291. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
How Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective.社会地位如何塑造人际感知与评价:社会神经科学视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 May;12(3):468-507. doi: 10.1177/1745691616677828.
10
Workplace status: The development and validation of a scale.工作场所状况:量表的编制与验证。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jul;102(7):1124-1147. doi: 10.1037/apl0000202. Epub 2017 Mar 23.