• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期两天的在线教育研讨会并未对系统性硬化症患者的疾病特异性知识产生影响。

An online, two-day educational seminar had no impact on disease-specific knowledge in patients with systemic sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Clinic for Pediatrics I, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64532-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-64532-4
PMID:38877137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11178768/
Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multifaceted disease, and its diagnosis triggers substantial anxiety and uncertainty for those affected. Currently, there are no valid data describing the impact of disease-specific patient education on the disease knowledge available. We created a two-day, online educational seminar to provide SSc patients with disease-specific information. The primary objective of the study was to observe the change in the disease-specific knowledge of the patients. A total of 118 patients were randomized into an intervention group and a waiting list control group. The change in knowledge was assessed using a multiple-choice test. The intervention group completed the questionnaire before, directly after, and 3 months after the seminar, while the waiting list control group also took the test 3 months before the seminar to rule out nonspecific learning. The primary outcome measure was the score difference between baseline and 3 months after baseline. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (protocol code DRKS00024915). The educational seminar resulted in a small, but measurable, increase in knowledge. While the two tests in the waiting list control group prior to the seminar did not show a nonspecific increase in disease knowledge, the intervention led to a numerical increase in knowledge (mean ± sd score difference 0.34 ± 1.31, 95% CI (- 0.23; 0.86), p = 0.26) that did not reach statistical significance. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that being a member of a self-help group (β = 1.12; p = 0.03) is a positive predictor of a higher disease knowledge. Although highly appreciated by participants, a two-day online seminar may not be the most appropriate format to generate measurable disease-specific knowledge. Self-help group membership was a positive predictor of a higher level of disease-specific knowledge prior to the educational seminar and should be recommended to every affected person.

摘要

系统性硬化症 (SSc) 是一种多方面的疾病,其诊断会给患者带来很大的焦虑和不确定性。目前,没有有效的数据描述疾病特异性患者教育对疾病知识的影响。我们创建了一个为期两天的在线教育研讨会,为 SSc 患者提供疾病特异性信息。该研究的主要目的是观察患者疾病特异性知识的变化。共有 118 名患者被随机分为干预组和候补名单对照组。使用多项选择题测试评估知识的变化。干预组在研讨会之前、直接之后和 3 个月后完成了问卷,而候补名单对照组也在研讨会前 3 个月进行了测试,以排除非特异性学习。主要的结果衡量标准是基线和基线后 3 个月的分数差异。该研究在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS00024915)注册。教育研讨会导致知识略有增加,但可以衡量。虽然候补名单对照组在研讨会前的两次测试并未显示出疾病知识的非特异性增加,但干预措施导致了知识的数值增加(平均 ± 标准差评分差异 0.34 ± 1.31,95%CI (-0.23;0.86),p = 0.26),但未达到统计学意义。多元线性回归分析显示,参加自助小组(β = 1.12;p = 0.03)是疾病知识更高的积极预测指标。尽管受到参与者的高度赞赏,但为期两天的在线研讨会可能不是生成可衡量的疾病特异性知识的最佳形式。参加自助小组是研讨会前疾病特异性知识水平较高的积极预测指标,应推荐给每位受影响的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/c316768e9315/41598_2024_64532_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/035d3e717fd7/41598_2024_64532_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/9c851d935e68/41598_2024_64532_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/c316768e9315/41598_2024_64532_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/035d3e717fd7/41598_2024_64532_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/9c851d935e68/41598_2024_64532_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1586/11178768/c316768e9315/41598_2024_64532_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An online, two-day educational seminar had no impact on disease-specific knowledge in patients with systemic sclerosis.一项为期两天的在线教育研讨会并未对系统性硬化症患者的疾病特异性知识产生影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64532-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The impact of a structured one-day seminar on disease-specific knowledge, lifestyle habits and disease impairment in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Results of a randomized, controlled study.在抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎中,为期一天的结构化研讨会对疾病特异性知识、生活方式习惯和疾病损害的影响。一项随机对照研究的结果。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;52(1):69-76. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1972534. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
4
The educational needs of people with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT).系统性硬化症患者的教育需求:一项使用荷兰版教育需求评估工具(D-ENAT)的横断面研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Feb;36(2):289-94. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3352-8. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
5
"The ABCs of AD": A prospective evaluation of the efficacy of an educational intervention to increase knowledge of autonomic dysreflexia management among emergency health care professionals.“自主神经反射异常的基础知识”:一项前瞻性评估教育干预措施效果的研究,该干预旨在提高急诊医护人员对自主神经反射异常管理的认识。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39(2):190-6. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000037. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate an Internet-Based Self-Management Program in Systemic Sclerosis.随机对照试验评估基于互联网的系统性硬化症自我管理方案。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Mar;71(3):435-447. doi: 10.1002/acr.23595. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
8
Greek teachers' knowledge about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.希腊教师对注意力缺陷多动障碍的了解。
Psychiatriki. 2017 Jul-Sep;28(3):226-233. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2017.283.226.
9
A short, animated video to improve good COVID-19 hygiene practices: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一个用于改善良好 COVID-19 卫生习惯的简短动画视频:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04449-1.
10
Evaluation of a vaccination seminar in regard to medical students' attitudes and their theoretical and practical vaccination-specific competencies.关于医学生态度及其理论和实践疫苗接种特定能力的疫苗接种研讨会评估。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc38. doi: 10.3205/zma001331. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge and Attitudes of Patients About the Rational Use of Antibiotics.患者对抗生素合理使用的认知与态度
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024 Mar 8;6(1):11-21. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2024.305. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Peer Support in Rheumatic Diseases: A Narrative Literature Review.风湿性疾病中的同伴支持:一项叙述性文献综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Oct 2;17:2433-2449. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S391396. eCollection 2023.
3
Systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis.
系统文献回顾为 EULAR 推荐的系统性红斑狼疮和系统性硬皮病的非药物治疗提供信息。
RMD Open. 2023 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003297.
4
Evaluation of a Clinic Education Program for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者临床教育项目评估
J Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;50(1):156-165.
5
World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set Development for Interstitial Lung Disease.世界卫生组织(WHO)间质性肺疾病功能、残疾和健康国际分类(ICF)核心集的制定
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 14;13:979788. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.979788. eCollection 2022.
6
Effects of a support group leader education program jointly developed by health professionals and patients on peer leader self-efficacy among leaders of scleroderma support groups: a two-arm parallel partially nested randomised controlled trial.由健康专业人员和患者共同制定的支持小组组长教育计划对硬皮病支持小组组长同行领导自我效能的影响:一项两臂平行部分嵌套随机对照试验。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Oct 28;17(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02552-x.
7
[Participation rate of diabetes patients in structured education programs and reasons for non-participation: A cross-sectional survey among patients with diabetes mellitus in Thuringia].[糖尿病患者参与结构化教育项目的比例及未参与原因:图林根州糖尿病患者的横断面调查]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Sep;173:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
Non-participation in a targeted prevention program aimed at lifestyle-related diseases: a questionnaire-based assessment of patient-reported reasons.不参与针对生活方式相关疾病的目标预防计划:基于问卷调查的患者报告原因评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 13;22(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13382-8.
9
Randomized feasibility trial of the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Self-Management (SPIN-SELF) Program.硬皮病患者中心干预网络自我管理(SPIN-SELF)计划的随机可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Feb 26;8(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00994-5.
10
The impact of a structured one-day seminar on disease-specific knowledge, lifestyle habits and disease impairment in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Results of a randomized, controlled study.在抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎中,为期一天的结构化研讨会对疾病特异性知识、生活方式习惯和疾病损害的影响。一项随机对照研究的结果。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;52(1):69-76. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1972534. Epub 2021 Oct 13.