Suppr超能文献

手部创伤手术中预防性使用抗生素的系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。

Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the use of prophylactic antibiotics in hand trauma surgery.

机构信息

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, UK.

Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 14;13(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02573-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery is contentious. With the rise in antimicrobial resistance, evidence-based antibiotic use should be followed. This systematic review and network meta-analysis will assess the effectiveness of different antibiotics on the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) following hand trauma surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The databases Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be searched. Abstracts will be screened by two persons independently to identify eligible studies. This systematic review will include both randomised and non-randomised prospective comparative studies in participants with hand and/or wrist injuries requiring surgery; bite injuries will be excluded. The network meta-analysis will compare the use of different prophylactic antibiotics against each other, placebo and/or no antibiotics on the development of SSI within 30 days of surgery (or 90 days if there is an implanted device). The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 will be used to assess the risk of methodological bias in randomised controlled trials, and the Newcastle-Ottowa scale (NOS) will be used to assess the risk of bias in non-randomised studies. A random-effects network meta-analysis will be conducted along with subgroup analyses looking at antibiotic timing, injury type, and operation location. Sensitivity analyses including only low risk-of-bias studies will be conducted, and the confidence in the results will be assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINEMA).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date synthesis of the studies assessing the use of antibiotics following hand and wrist trauma to enable evidence-based peri-operative prescribing.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023429618.

摘要

背景

手术中预防性使用抗生素存在争议。随着抗菌药物耐药性的上升,应遵循基于证据的抗生素使用原则。本系统评价和网络荟萃分析将评估不同抗生素在手外伤手术后预防手术部位感染(SSI)的有效性。

方法和分析

将检索 Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 CENTRAL、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台等数据库。两名人员将独立筛选摘要,以确定合格的研究。本系统评价将包括需要手术治疗的手部和/或腕部损伤参与者的随机和非随机前瞻性对照研究;将排除咬伤。网络荟萃分析将比较不同预防性抗生素之间、安慰剂和/或无抗生素在术后 30 天(或植入装置时为 90 天)内发生 SSI 的情况。将使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2 评估随机对照试验的方法学偏倚风险,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估非随机研究的偏倚风险。将进行随机效应网络荟萃分析,并进行亚组分析,观察抗生素时机、损伤类型和手术部位。将进行仅包括低偏倚风险研究的敏感性分析,并使用网络荟萃分析置信度(CINEMA)评估结果的置信度。

讨论

本系统评价和网络荟萃分析旨在提供最新的评估手部和腕部创伤后使用抗生素的研究综合结果,以实现围手术期基于证据的处方。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42023429618。

相似文献

2
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验