Suppr超能文献

制定实施过程中干预灵活性最优决策方法(MODIFI):一项改良德尔菲研究

Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): a modified Delphi study.

作者信息

Brewer Stephanie K, Corbin Catherine M, Baumann Ana A, Stirman Shannon Wiltsey, Jones Janine M, Pullmann Michael D, Lyon Aaron R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74Th St, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.

School of Special Education, School Psychology, and Early Childhood Studies, College of Education, University of Florida, Norman Hall, Room 1801, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jun 17;5(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00592-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources.

METHOD

MODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability and inclusion (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

In Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application.

DISCUSSION

MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective.

摘要

背景

为了提高循证实践/项目与实施环境的匹配度,干预措施的调整往往是必要的。现有的框架描述了干预措施的调整过程,但没有提供前瞻性设计调整的详细步骤,是为研究人员设计的,并且需要大量时间和资源才能完成。需要一种务实的方法来指导实施者在当地环境中开展和评估调整措施。本项目的目标是开发“实施过程中干预灵活性的最优决策制定”(MODIFI),这是一种干预措施调整方法,它利用以人为本的设计方法,并根据在时间和资源有限的应用环境中工作的干预措施实施者的需求进行定制。

方法

通过混合方法改进的德尔菲法对MODIFI进行迭代开发。收集了43位实施研究和实践专家的反馈。两轮数据收集分别收集了可接受性和纳入度(第一轮)以及可行性(第二轮)的定量评分,以及使用常规内容分析法分析的关于MODIFI修订的定性反馈。

结果

在第一轮中,大多数参与者将所有提议的组件评为必不可少的,但确定了重要的修订途径,并在第二轮之前纳入了MODIFI。第二轮强调可行性,评分普遍较高,建议进行的实质性修订较少。第二轮的更改主要围绕术语/过程的操作化和内容的排序。结果包括详细介绍三步MODIFI方法的最终版本(步骤1:了解用户、当地环境和干预措施;步骤2:调整干预措施;步骤3:评估调整措施)以及其应用的案例。

讨论

MODIFI是一种务实的方法,旨在扩展其他基于研究的调整理论、模型和框架的贡献,同时整合针对干预措施实施者需求定制设计的方法。指导团队根据当地环境调整循证干预措施,可能会扩大干预措施在哪些人群中、在何处以及在何种条件下有效的范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac87/11181660/96e025bea244/43058_2024_592_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验