Ruíz-Uribe Matías, Enríquez-Schmidt Javier, Monrroy-Uarac Manuel, Mautner-Molina Camila, Kalazich-Rosales Mariana, Muñoz Maximiliano, Fuentes-Leal Francisca, Cárcamo-Ibaceta Carlos, Fazakerley Daniel J, Larance Mark, Ehrenfeld Pamela, Martínez-Huenchullán Sergio
Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Function Laboratory-Neyün, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3273. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113273.
Bariatric surgery candidates require presurgical physical training, therefore, we compared the metabolic effects of a constant moderate-intensity training program (MICT) vs. a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in this population. Seventeen participants performed MICT (n = 9, intensity of 50% of heart rate reserve (HRR) and/or 4-5/10 subjective sensation of effort (SSE)) or HIIT (n = 8, 6 cycles of 2.5 min at 80% of the HRR and/or 7-8/10 of SSE, interspersed by 6 cycles of active rest at 20% of the FCR) for 10 sessions for 4 weeks. After training, tissue samples (skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and liver) were extracted, and protein levels of adiponectin, GLUT4, PGC1α, phospho-AMPK/AMPK, collagen 1 and TGFβ1 were measured. Participants who performed MICT showed higher protein levels of PGC-1α in skeletal muscle samples (1.1 ± 0.27 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4-fold change, < 0.05). In the liver samples of the people who performed HIIT, lower protein levels of phospho-AMPK/AMPK (1.0 ± 0.37 vs. 0.52 ± 0.22-fold change), PGC-1α (1.0 ± 0.18 vs. 0.69 ± 0.15-fold change), and collagen 1 (1.0 ± 0.26 vs. 0.59 ± 0.28-fold change) were observed (all < 0.05). In subcutaneous adipose tissue, higher adiponectin levels were found only after HIIT training (1.1 ± 0.48 vs. 1.9 ± 0.69-fold change, < 0.05). Our results show that both MICT and HIIT confer metabolic benefits in candidates undergoing bariatric surgery; however, most of these benefits have a program-specific fashion. Future studies should aim to elucidate the mechanisms behind these differences.
减肥手术候选人需要术前体能训练,因此,我们比较了持续中等强度训练计划(MICT)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对该人群的代谢影响。17名参与者进行了MICT(n = 9,强度为心率储备(HRR)的50%和/或主观用力感觉(SSE)为4-5/10)或HIIT(n = 8,以HRR的80%进行6个2.5分钟的周期和/或SSE为7-8/10,穿插6个以心率储备(FCR)的20%进行的主动休息周期),共进行10节训练课,为期4周。训练后,提取组织样本(骨骼肌、脂肪组织和肝脏),并测量脂联素、葡萄糖转运蛋白4(GLUT4)、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ辅激活因子1α(PGC1α)、磷酸化腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶/腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶(phospho-AMPK/AMPK)、胶原蛋白1和转化生长因子β1(TGFβ1)的蛋白质水平。进行MICT的参与者骨骼肌样本中PGC-1α的蛋白质水平较高(变化倍数为1.1±0.27 vs. 0.7±0.4,P<0.05)。在进行HIIT的人的肝脏样本中,观察到磷酸化腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶/腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶(变化倍数为1.0±0.37 vs. 0.52±0.22)、PGC-1α(变化倍数为1.0±0.18 vs. 0.69±0.15)和胶原蛋白1(变化倍数为1.0±0.26 vs. 0.59±0.28)的蛋白质水平较低(均P<0.05)。在皮下脂肪组织中,仅在HIIT训练后发现脂联素水平较高(变化倍数为1.1±0.48 vs. 1.9±0.69,P<0.05)。我们的结果表明,MICT和HIIT对接受减肥手术的候选人都有代谢益处;然而,这些益处大多具有特定训练计划的方式。未来的研究应旨在阐明这些差异背后的机制。