Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死:冠心病监护病房、医院病房还是居家管理?

Acute myocardial infarction: coronary care unit, hospital ward or home management?

作者信息

Bernard R

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 1979;34(4):269-78.

PMID:388959
Abstract

The need of admission of all patients with acute myocardial infarction in a CCU is questioned by some british authors. A critical review of their publications stresses the most important methodological problems they could not overcome; consequently they cannot allow any valuable comparison. There are no randomized trial related to the comparison of general ward to CCU care, but the available data obtained by studies based on bed availability show a definite advantage of the CCU. At the present stage of our knowledge, admission in a CCU must be recommended to all patients seen in the first hours after the presumed onset of the disease; after some delay (12 h?) systematic admission is not justified any more and the decision should be taken according to each case, in relation to the clinical status and familial or social conditions.

摘要

一些英国作者对所有急性心肌梗死患者都需入住冠心病监护病房(CCU)这一需求提出了质疑。对他们发表的文章进行批判性回顾后发现,他们存在一些无法克服的重要方法学问题;因此,他们无法进行任何有价值的比较。目前尚无关于普通病房与CCU护理比较的随机试验,但基于床位可利用情况的研究所得出的现有数据表明,CCU具有明显优势。在我们目前的认知阶段,对于在疾病假定发作后的最初数小时内就诊的所有患者,建议入住CCU;经过一段时间延迟(12小时?)后,系统性入住就不再合理,应根据每个病例的临床状况以及家庭或社会情况来做出决定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验