Bernard R
Acta Cardiol. 1979;34(4):269-78.
The need of admission of all patients with acute myocardial infarction in a CCU is questioned by some british authors. A critical review of their publications stresses the most important methodological problems they could not overcome; consequently they cannot allow any valuable comparison. There are no randomized trial related to the comparison of general ward to CCU care, but the available data obtained by studies based on bed availability show a definite advantage of the CCU. At the present stage of our knowledge, admission in a CCU must be recommended to all patients seen in the first hours after the presumed onset of the disease; after some delay (12 h?) systematic admission is not justified any more and the decision should be taken according to each case, in relation to the clinical status and familial or social conditions.
一些英国作者对所有急性心肌梗死患者都需入住冠心病监护病房(CCU)这一需求提出了质疑。对他们发表的文章进行批判性回顾后发现,他们存在一些无法克服的重要方法学问题;因此,他们无法进行任何有价值的比较。目前尚无关于普通病房与CCU护理比较的随机试验,但基于床位可利用情况的研究所得出的现有数据表明,CCU具有明显优势。在我们目前的认知阶段,对于在疾病假定发作后的最初数小时内就诊的所有患者,建议入住CCU;经过一段时间延迟(12小时?)后,系统性入住就不再合理,应根据每个病例的临床状况以及家庭或社会情况来做出决定。