Kigo Joyce, Kamau Stephen, Mawji Alishah, Mwaniki Paul, Dunsmuir Dustin, Pillay Yashodani, Zhang Cherri, Pallot Katija, Ogero Morris, Kimutai David, Ouma Mary, Mohamed Ismael, Chege Mary, Thuranira Lydia, Kissoon Niranjan, Ansermino J Mark, Akech Samuel
Health Service Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Centre for International Child Health, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jun 21;3(6):e0000293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000293. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Models for digital triage of sick children at emergency departments of hospitals in resource poor settings have been developed. However, prior to their adoption, external validation should be performed to ensure their generalizability. We externally validated a previously published nine-predictor paediatric triage model (Smart Triage) developed in Uganda using data from two hospitals in Kenya. Both discrimination and calibration were assessed, and recalibration was performed by optimizing the intercept for classifying patients into emergency, priority, or non-urgent categories based on low-risk and high-risk thresholds. A total of 2539 patients were eligible at Hospital 1 and 2464 at Hospital 2, and 5003 for both hospitals combined; admission rates were 8.9%, 4.5%, and 6.8%, respectively. The model showed good discrimination, with area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 0.826, 0.784 and 0.821, respectively. The pre-calibrated model at a low-risk threshold of 8% achieved a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval, (CI):89%-96%), 81% (CI:74%-88%), and 89% (CI:85%-92%), respectively, and at a high-risk threshold of 40%, the model achieved a specificity of 86% (CI:84%-87%), 96% (CI:95%-97%), and 91% (CI:90%-92%), respectively. Recalibration improved the graphical fit, but new risk thresholds were required to optimize sensitivity and specificity.The Smart Triage model showed good discrimination on external validation but required recalibration to improve the graphical fit of the calibration plot. There was no change in the order of prioritization of patients following recalibration in the respective triage categories. Recalibration required new site-specific risk thresholds that may not be needed if prioritization based on rank is all that is required. The Smart Triage model shows promise for wider application for use in triage for sick children in different settings.
已开发出资源匮乏地区医院急诊科对患病儿童进行数字分诊的模型。然而,在采用这些模型之前,应进行外部验证以确保其可推广性。我们使用肯尼亚两家医院的数据对先前在乌干达开发的一个包含九个预测指标的儿科分诊模型(智能分诊)进行了外部验证。评估了该模型的区分度和校准情况,并通过优化截距进行重新校准,以便根据低风险和高风险阈值将患者分类为紧急、优先或非紧急类别。医院1共有2539例患者符合条件,医院2有2464例,两家医院合并共有5003例;入院率分别为8.9%、4.5%和6.8%。该模型显示出良好的区分度,受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积分别为0.826、0.784和0.821。在低风险阈值为8%时,预校准模型的灵敏度分别为93%(95%置信区间,CI:89%-96%)、81%(CI:74%-88%)和89%(CI:85%-92%),在高风险阈值为40%时,该模型的特异度分别为86%(CI:84%-87%)、96%(CI:95%-97%)和91%(CI:90%-92%)。重新校准改善了图形拟合,但需要新的风险阈值来优化灵敏度和特异度。智能分诊模型在外部验证中显示出良好的区分度,但需要重新校准以改善校准图的图形拟合。重新校准后,各分诊类别中患者的优先顺序没有变化。重新校准需要特定地点的新风险阈值,如果仅需要基于等级的优先排序,则可能不需要这些阈值。智能分诊模型有望在不同环境中更广泛地应用于患病儿童的分诊。