• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实世界环境下的 COVID-19 快速、无实验室分诊用于紧急护理的评估:人工智能驱动的筛查的外部验证和试点部署。

Real-world evaluation of rapid and laboratory-free COVID-19 triage for emergency care: external validation and pilot deployment of artificial intelligence driven screening.

机构信息

John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Apr;4(4):e266-e278. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00272-7. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00272-7
PMID:35279399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty in patients' COVID-19 status contributes to treatment delays, nosocomial transmission, and operational pressures in hospitals. However, the typical turnaround time for laboratory PCR remains 12-24 h and lateral flow devices (LFDs) have limited sensitivity. Previously, we have shown that artificial intelligence-driven triage (CURIAL-1.0) can provide rapid COVID-19 screening using clinical data routinely available within 1 h of arrival to hospital. Here, we aimed to improve the time from arrival to the emergency department to the availability of a result, do external and prospective validation, and deploy a novel laboratory-free screening tool in a UK emergency department.

METHODS

We optimised our previous model, removing less informative predictors to improve generalisability and speed, developing the CURIAL-Lab model with vital signs and readily available blood tests (full blood count [FBC]; urea, creatinine, and electrolytes; liver function tests; and C-reactive protein) and the CURIAL-Rapide model with vital signs and FBC alone. Models were validated externally for emergency admissions to University Hospitals Birmingham, Bedfordshire Hospitals, and Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service (NHS) trusts, and prospectively at Oxford University Hospitals, by comparison with PCR testing. Next, we compared model performance directly against LFDs and evaluated a combined pathway that triaged patients who had either a positive CURIAL model result or a positive LFD to a COVID-19-suspected clinical area. Lastly, we deployed CURIAL-Rapide alongside an approved point-of-care FBC analyser to provide laboratory-free COVID-19 screening at the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford, UK). Our primary improvement outcome was time-to-result, and our performance measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

FINDINGS

72 223 patients met eligibility criteria across the four validating hospital groups, in a total validation period spanning Dec 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021. CURIAL-Lab and CURIAL-Rapide performed consistently across trusts (AUROC range 0·858-0·881, 95% CI 0·838-0·912, for CURIAL-Lab and 0·836-0·854, 0·814-0·889, for CURIAL-Rapide), achieving highest sensitivity at Portsmouth Hospitals (84·1%, Wilson's 95% CI 82·5-85·7, for CURIAL-Lab and 83·5%, 81·8-85·1, for CURIAL-Rapide) at specificities of 71·3% (70·9-71·8) for CURIAL-Lab and 63·6% (63·1-64·1) for CURIAL-Rapide. When combined with LFDs, model predictions improved triage sensitivity from 56·9% (51·7-62·0) for LFDs alone to 85·6% with CURIAL-Lab (81·6-88·9; AUROC 0·925) and 88·2% with CURIAL-Rapide (84·4-91·1; AUROC 0·919), thereby reducing missed COVID-19 cases by 65% with CURIAL-Lab and 72% with CURIAL-Rapide. For the prospective deployment of CURIAL-Rapide, 520 patients were enrolled for point-of-care FBC analysis between Feb 18 and May 10, 2021, of whom 436 received confirmatory PCR testing and ten (2·3%) tested positive. Median time from arrival to a CURIAL-Rapide result was 45 min (IQR 32-64), 16 min (26·3%) sooner than with LFDs (61 min, 37-99; log-rank p<0·0001), and 6 h 52 min (90·2%) sooner than with PCR (7 h 37 min, 6 h 5 min to 15 h 39 min; p<0·0001). Classification performance was high, with sensitivity of 87·5% (95% CI 52·9-97·8), specificity of 85·4% (81·3-88·7), and negative predictive value of 99·7% (98·2-99·9). CURIAL-Rapide correctly excluded infection for 31 (58·5%) of 53 patients who were triaged by a physician to a COVID-19-suspected area but went on to test negative by PCR.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings show the generalisability, performance, and real-world operational benefits of artificial intelligence-driven screening for COVID-19 over standard-of-care in emergency departments. CURIAL-Rapide provided rapid, laboratory-free screening when used with near-patient FBC analysis, and was able to reduce the number of patients who tested negative for COVID-19 but were triaged to COVID-19-suspected areas.

FUNDING

The Wellcome Trust, University of Oxford Medical and Life Sciences Translational Fund.

摘要

背景

患者 COVID-19 状态的不确定性导致治疗延误、医院内的继发感染和运营压力。然而,实验室 PCR 的典型周转时间仍为 12-24 小时,而侧向流动设备(LFD)的灵敏度有限。之前,我们已经表明,人工智能驱动的分诊(CURIAL-1.0)可以使用患者到达医院后 1 小时内常规获得的临床数据提供快速的 COVID-19 筛查。在这里,我们旨在提高从到达急诊室到获得结果的时间,进行外部和前瞻性验证,并在英国急诊室部署一种新的无实验室筛查工具。

方法

我们优化了之前的模型,删除了不太有信息的预测因素以提高通用性和速度,开发了包含生命体征和易于获得的血液测试(全血细胞计数[FBC];尿素、肌酐和电解质;肝功能测试;C 反应蛋白)的 CURIAL-Lab 模型,以及包含生命体征和 FBC 的 CURIAL-Rapide 模型。通过与 PCR 检测比较,在英国伯明翰大学医院、贝德福德郡医院和朴茨茅斯医院 NHS 信托基金进行了外部验证,在牛津大学医院进行了前瞻性验证。接下来,我们直接比较了模型性能与 LFD,并评估了一种联合途径,该途径将 CURIAL 模型结果阳性或 LFD 阳性的患者分诊到 COVID-19 疑似临床区域。最后,我们在牛津大学约翰拉德克利夫医院(英国牛津)部署了 CURIAL-Rapide 与经批准的即时 FBC 分析仪一起提供无实验室 COVID-19 筛查。我们的主要改进结果是获得结果的时间,我们的性能指标包括敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)。

结果

在总共涵盖 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日的四个验证医院组中,共有 72223 名患者符合纳入标准。CURIAL-Lab 和 CURIAL-Rapide 在各信托基金中表现一致(AUROC 范围为 0.858-0.881,95%CI 为 0.838-0.912,用于 CURIAL-Lab 和 0.836-0.854,95%CI 为 0.814-0.889,用于 CURIAL-Rapide),在朴茨茅斯医院达到最高敏感性(84.1%,Wilson 95%CI 为 82.5-85.7,用于 CURIAL-Lab 和 83.5%,81.8-85.1,用于 CURIAL-Rapide),特异性为 71.3%(70.9-71.8),用于 CURIAL-Lab 和 63.6%(63.1-64.1),用于 CURIAL-Rapide。当与 LFD 结合使用时,模型预测通过将 LFD 单独使用时的分诊敏感性从 56.9%(51.7-62.0)提高到 CURIAL-Lab 的 85.6%(81.6-88.9;AUROC 为 0.925)和 CURIAL-Rapide 的 88.2%(84.4-91.1;AUROC 为 0.919),从而使 CURIAL-Lab 减少了 65%的 COVID-19 漏诊病例,使 CURIAL-Rapide 减少了 72%的 COVID-19 漏诊病例。对于 CURIAL-Rapide 的前瞻性部署,在 2021 年 2 月 18 日至 5 月 10 日期间,有 520 名患者接受了即时 FBC 分析,其中 436 名患者接受了确认性 PCR 检测,10 名(2.3%)检测呈阳性。从到达到 CURIAL-Rapide 结果的中位时间为 45 分钟(IQR 32-64),比 LFD 快 16 分钟(26.3%)(61 分钟,37-99;对数秩检验 p<0.0001),比 PCR 快 6 小时 52 分钟(7 小时 37 分钟,6 小时 5 分钟至 15 小时 39 分钟;p<0.0001)。分类性能很高,敏感性为 87.5%(95%CI 为 52.9-97.8),特异性为 85.4%(81.3-88.7),阴性预测值为 99.7%(98.2-99.9)。CURIAL-Rapide 正确排除了 31 名(58.5%)医生分诊到 COVID-19 疑似区域但 PCR 检测结果为阴性的患者的感染。

解释

我们的研究结果表明,人工智能驱动的 COVID-19 筛查在急诊室中具有普遍性、性能和实际操作优势,超过了标准护理。CURIAL-Rapide 与即时 FBC 分析结合使用时提供了快速的无实验室筛查,并且能够减少 PCR 检测为阴性但被分诊到 COVID-19 疑似区域的患者数量。

资助

惠康信托基金,牛津大学医学和生命科学转化基金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/273323bfe6e6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/ad21da65e652/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/72abd4569dcc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/a7d67b6e9f90/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/273323bfe6e6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/ad21da65e652/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/72abd4569dcc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/a7d67b6e9f90/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/8940638/273323bfe6e6/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-world evaluation of rapid and laboratory-free COVID-19 triage for emergency care: external validation and pilot deployment of artificial intelligence driven screening.真实世界环境下的 COVID-19 快速、无实验室分诊用于紧急护理的评估:人工智能驱动的筛查的外部验证和试点部署。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Apr;4(4):e266-e278. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00272-7. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
A scalable federated learning solution for secondary care using low-cost microcomputing: privacy-preserving development and evaluation of a COVID-19 screening test in UK hospitals.一种使用低成本微型计算机的二级医疗可扩展联邦学习解决方案:英国医院 COVID-19 筛查测试的隐私保护开发和评估。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Feb;6(2):e93-e104. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00226-1.
3
Rapid triage for COVID-19 using routine clinical data for patients attending hospital: development and prospective validation of an artificial intelligence screening test.利用常规临床数据对就诊患者进行 COVID-19 的快速分诊:人工智能筛查测试的开发和前瞻性验证。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Feb;3(2):e78-e87. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30274-0. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests and association with detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.SARS-CoV-2 侧向流动抗原检测的比较性能及其与临床标本中传染性病毒检测的关联:一项单中心实验室评估研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e461-e471. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00143-9. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
6
Performance of antigen lateral flow devices in the UK during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a diagnostic and observational study.抗原侧向流动设备在英国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的阿尔法、德尔塔和奥密克戎波期间的表现:一项诊断和观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Aug;23(8):922-932. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00129-9. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
7
Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study.评估一种新型的、无实验室的 SARS-CoV-2(CovidNudge)即时护理检测方法:一项诊断准确性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Nov;1(7):e300-e307. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30121-X. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Utility of the FebriDx point-of-care assay in supporting a triage algorithm for medical admissions with possible COVID-19: an observational cohort study.基于可能患有 COVID-19 的患者的分诊算法,即时检验在医疗入院中的效用:一项观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e049179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049179.
9
Deep learning-based triage and analysis of lesion burden for COVID-19: a retrospective study with external validation.基于深度学习的 COVID-19 病变负担分类和分析:一项具有外部验证的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e506-e515. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30199-0. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
Clinical impact of molecular point-of-care testing for suspected COVID-19 in hospital (COV-19POC): a prospective, interventional, non-randomised, controlled study.针对疑似 COVID-19 患者的床边即时分子检测对临床的影响:一项前瞻性、干预性、非随机对照研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1192-1200. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30454-9. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Rigorous validation of machine learning in laboratory medicine: guidance toward quality improvement.实验室医学中机器学习的严格验证:质量改进指南。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2025 Aug;62(5):327-346. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2025.2488842. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.绘制并总结用于自动采集病史和分诊的人工智能系统的研究:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 6;27:e53741. doi: 10.2196/53741.
3
Prevalence of COVID-19 and associated factors among healthcare workers in the war-torn Tigray, Ethiopia.

本文引用的文献

1
A blood atlas of COVID-19 defines hallmarks of disease severity and specificity.COVID-19 血液图谱定义了疾病严重程度和特异性的特征。
Cell. 2022 Mar 3;185(5):916-938.e58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
2
Early outcome detection for COVID-19 patients.COVID-19 患者的早期预后检测。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 16;11(1):18464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97990-1.
3
Hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK's first COVID-19 pandemic wave.英国首次新冠疫情浪潮中的医院获得性严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染
新冠疫情在饱受战争蹂躏的提格雷地区医护人员中的流行情况及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0310128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310128. eCollection 2024.
4
Knowledge abstraction and filtering based federated learning over heterogeneous data views in healthcare.医疗保健领域中基于异构数据视图的知识抽象与过滤联邦学习
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 16;7(1):283. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01272-9.
5
Generalizability assessment of AI models across hospitals in a low-middle and high income country.在中低收入和高收入国家的医院之间评估人工智能模型的泛化能力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 27;15(1):8270. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52618-6.
6
Implementing AI in Hospitals to Achieve a Learning Health System: Systematic Review of Current Enablers and Barriers.在医院中实施人工智能以实现学习型医疗体系:对当前推动因素和障碍的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 2;26:e49655. doi: 10.2196/49655.
7
Addressing label noise for electronic health records: insights from computer vision for tabular data.解决电子健康记录中的标签噪声:来自表格数据计算机视觉的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02581-5.
8
Mitigating machine learning bias between high income and low-middle income countries for enhanced model fairness and generalizability.减轻高收入和中低收入国家之间机器学习的偏差,以提高模型的公平性和泛化能力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 10;14(1):13318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64210-5.
9
Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit: Current Evidence on an Inevitable Future Tool.重症监护病房中的人工智能:关于一种不可避免的未来工具的当前证据。
Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59797. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59797. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Deep reinforcement learning for multi-class imbalanced training: applications in healthcare.用于多类不平衡训练的深度强化学习:在医疗保健中的应用
Mach Learn. 2024;113(5):2655-2674. doi: 10.1007/s10994-023-06481-z. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1037-1038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01786-4. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic platform for rapid near-patient hematology.用于快速床旁血液学检查的人工智能辅助诊断平台。
Am J Hematol. 2021 Oct 1;96(10):1264-1274. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26295. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
COVID-19 diagnosis by routine blood tests using machine learning.利用机器学习通过常规血液检测诊断 COVID-19。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90265-9.
6
Factors associated with deaths due to COVID-19 versus other causes: population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care data and linked national death registrations within the OpenSAFELY platform.与2019冠状病毒病相关死亡与其他原因导致死亡的相关因素:基于人群的队列分析,涉及英国初级医疗数据以及OpenSAFELY平台内相关的国家死亡登记信息
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jul;6:100109. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100109. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
The COVID-19 lab score: an accurate dynamic tool to predict in-hospital outcomes in COVID-19 patients.COVID-19 实验室评分:一种准确的动态工具,可预测 COVID-19 患者的住院结局。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88679-6.
8
Covid-19: MHRA is concerned over use of rapid lateral flow devices for mass testing.新冠疫情:药品和医疗产品监管局对大规模检测中使用快速侧向流动检测设备表示担忧。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 28;373:n1090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1090.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
10
Artificial intelligence for COVID-19: saviour or saboteur?用于应对新冠疫情的人工智能:救星还是破坏者?
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jan;3(1):e1. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30295-8.