Alhamdan Mai M, Knowles Jonathan C, McDonald Ailbhe V
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Division of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, University College London, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 22;16(6):e62921. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62921. eCollection 2024 Jun.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the potential remineralization of enamel and dentine erosion lesions after the application of five different toothpastes.
A total of 104 enamel and dentine samples were prepared from maxillary third molars. Each group was divided according to the toothpaste application mode (topical = 56; brushing = 48) and the toothpaste used seven topical groups and six brushing groups (n = 8). The groups included negative control (NC), positive control (PC), Sensodyne Pronamel (SP), Regenerate (R), Regenerate with boosting serum (R+), Colgate Duraphat 5000 (CD), and tooth mousse (TM).
The statistical analysis showed significant surface microhardness (SMH) change. All enamel groups showed a significant decrease in SMH compared to NC for both application modes. However, no significance was recorded between test groups. Similar results were observed between dentine groups and their relevant controls for both application modes, except brushed R and R+ groups, which were insignificant to their NC. For topical groups, TM showed a significant increase in SMH. While R and R+ showed lower loss than SP and CD.
All tested agents offered a degree of remineralization in both enamel and dentine with no significant difference between agents in enamel groups while R, R+, and TM offered better results in dentine groups.
For dentine groups, similar findings were observed with superior tooth surface protection with the application of TM over other agents. Tooth surface remineralization was achieved when agents were either applied topically or brushed over the surface.
本体外研究的目的是评估应用五种不同牙膏后釉质和牙本质侵蚀性病变的潜在再矿化情况。
从上颌第三磨牙制备了总共104个釉质和牙本质样本。根据牙膏的应用方式(局部应用=56个;刷牙=48个)和所使用的牙膏将每组进行划分,有七个局部应用组和六个刷牙组(n=8)。这些组包括阴性对照(NC)、阳性对照(PC)、舒适达专业修复牙膏(SP)、Regenerate(R)、含强化血清的Regenerate(R+)、高露洁Duraphat 5000(CD)和护齿素(TM)。
统计分析显示表面显微硬度(SMH)有显著变化。对于两种应用方式,所有釉质组的SMH与NC相比均显著降低。然而,测试组之间未记录到显著性差异。对于两种应用方式,牙本质组与其相关对照之间观察到类似结果,但刷牙的R组和R+组与其NC相比无显著性差异。对于局部应用组,TM的SMH显著增加。而R和R+的损失低于SP和CD。
所有测试剂在釉质和牙本质中均提供了一定程度的再矿化,釉质组中各剂之间无显著差异,而R、R+和TM在牙本质组中效果更好。
对于牙本质组,观察到类似的结果,应用TM比其他剂对牙齿表面有更好的保护。当剂局部应用或刷于表面时可实现牙齿表面再矿化。