Suppr超能文献

乍得传统治疗师用于治疗蠕虫病的[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]提取物的驱虫活性及植物成分研究

Anthelmintic Activities of and Extracts Used in Chad by Traditional Healers for the Treatment of Helminthiasis and Study of Phytoconstituents.

作者信息

Christalin Baigomen, Besati Masoud, Christelle Nadia Noumedem Anangmo, Yaghoobi Mahdi, Cédric Yamssi, Ciancia Claire, Abdel Azizi Mounvera, Guy-Armand Gamago Nkadeu, Khan Payne Vincent, Hu Haibo

机构信息

Department of Animal Biology Faculty of Science University of Dschang, P.O. Box 067, Dschang, Cameroon.

Laboratory of Tropical and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Dschang, Cameroon.

出版信息

J Trop Med. 2024 Jun 28;2024:8564163. doi: 10.1155/2024/8564163. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helminthiasis is endemic in Chad and constitutes a public health problem, particularly among school-age children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anthelmintic activity of extracts of and used in Chad by traditional healers for the treatment of helminthiasis.

METHODS

The anthelmintic activity was assessed against and larvae using the Worm Microtracker. Embryonated eggs, L1, L2, and L3 larvae of were obtained after 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days of coproculture and L4 larvae of culture using standard procedures. One hundred microliters of extracts at various concentrations, with albendazole and distilled water were, put in contact with 100 L of suspension (containing 50 parasites at various developmental stages) in a microplate and incubated for 20 h at 25°C in the Worm Microtracker. The same procedure was adopted for , but with 180 L of OP50. 19 L of suspension (containing 50 larvae) was put in contact with 1 L of extract at various concentrations and incubated in the Worm Microtracker. Docking studies were carried out using the Schrodinger Maestro software's Glide module. The score function in the software was used to rank and group distinct possible adduct structures generated by molecular docking.

RESULTS

The aqueous and ethanolic extracts of at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL showed the same activity as albendazole (100 ± 0.00) on hatching. The IC50s of the aqueous extracts of the two plants (IC: 0.6212 mg/mL and 0.71 mg/mL, respectively) were comparable on egg hatching of with no significant difference ( ≥ 0.05) with respect to the ethanol extracts (IC: 0.70 mg/mL and 0.81 mg/mL, respectively). There was no significant difference between the percentage inhibition of extracts and albendazole on the L1 larvae of ( ≥ 0.05). The aqueous extracts acted more effectively than the ethanol extracts on the L1 larvae of with an IC of 0.5588 and ∼9.858 - 005 mg/ml, respectively, for and . The aqueous extracts of and on L3 larvae of had inhibitory percentages of 92.6 ± 0.62 and 91.37 ± 0.8 at 2.5 mg/mL which were lower than albendazole (100 ± 0.00). The aqueous extracts of and on showed IC of 0.2775 g/mL and 0.5115 g/mL, respectively, and were more effective than the ethanol extracts. Examining and through the interaction with the protein receptor and its results also confirmed our assumption that the compound used has hydroxyl and carbonyl groups as well as aromatic rings and is exposed to phenolic and flavonoid groups in a more specific way, and it shows a better inhibitory effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This study scientifically validates the use of extracts of the two plants in the traditional treatment of helminthiasis. However, it will be necessary to evaluate the anthelmintic activity and toxicity. Examining the ADME properties of these compounds also supports the potential of these ligands to be transformed into pharmaceutical forms.

摘要

背景

蠕虫病在乍得呈地方性流行,构成公共卫生问题,尤其是在学龄儿童中。本研究旨在评估乍得传统治疗师用于治疗蠕虫病的[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]提取物的驱虫活性。

方法

使用蠕虫微追踪器评估提取物对[寄生虫名称1]和[寄生虫名称2]幼虫的驱虫活性。按照标准程序,在粪便培养24小时、48小时和7天后获得[寄生虫名称1]的受精虫卵、L1、L2和L3幼虫,并培养获得[寄生虫名称2]的L4幼虫。将100微升不同浓度的提取物、阿苯达唑和蒸馏水与微孔板中100微升的[寄生虫名称1]悬浮液(含有处于不同发育阶段的50个寄生虫)接触,并在蠕虫微追踪器中于25°C孵育20小时。对[寄生虫名称2]采用相同程序,但使用180微升的OP50。将19微升的[寄生虫名称2]悬浮液(含有50个幼虫)与1微升不同浓度的提取物接触,并在蠕虫微追踪器中孵育。使用薛定谔Maestro软件的Glide模块进行对接研究。软件中的评分函数用于对分子对接产生的不同可能加合物结构进行排名和分组。

结果

浓度为2.5毫克/毫升的[植物名称1]水提取物和乙醇提取物在孵化方面显示出与阿苯达唑相同的活性(100±0.00)。两种植物水提取物对[寄生虫名称1]卵孵化的半数抑制浓度(IC50分别为0.6212毫克/毫升和0.71毫克/毫升)与乙醇提取物(IC50分别为0.70毫克/毫升和0.81毫克/毫升)相当,差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。提取物和阿苯达唑对[寄生虫名称1]L1幼虫的抑制率差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。水提取物对[寄生虫名称1]L1幼虫的作用比乙醇提取物更有效,[植物名称1]水提取物和[植物名称2]水提取物对[寄生虫名称1]L1幼虫的IC50分别为0.5588和9.858×1−05毫克/毫升。[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]的水提取物对[寄生虫名称2]L3幼虫在2.5毫克/毫升时的抑制率分别为92.6±0.62和91.37±0.8,低于阿苯达唑(100±0.00)。[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]的水提取物对[寄生虫名称2]的IC50分别为0.2775微克/毫升和0.5115微克/毫升,且比乙醇提取物更有效。通过与蛋白质受体相互作用研究[植物名称1]和[植物名称2],其结果也证实了我们的假设,即所使用的化合物具有羟基、羰基以及芳香环,并且以更特定的方式含有酚类和黄酮类基团,显示出更好的抑制作用。

结论

本研究科学验证了这两种植物提取物在传统治疗蠕虫病中的应用。然而,有必要评估其驱虫活性和毒性。研究这些化合物的吸收、分布、代谢和排泄特性也支持了这些配体转化为药物形式的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c781/11226339/534bfc06e822/JTM2024-8564163.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验