Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo.
Behavioral Insights Team, Steele Institute for Health Innovation, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):381-394. doi: 10.1177/0956797620969170. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
How can people wisely navigate social conflict? Two preregistered longitudinal experiments (Study 1: Canadian adults; Study 2: American and Canadian adults; total = 555) tested whether encouraging distanced (i.e., third-person) self-reflection would help promote wisdom. Both experiments measured wise reasoning (i.e., intellectual humility, open-mindedness about how situations could unfold, consideration of and attempts to integrate diverse viewpoints) about challenging interpersonal events. In a month-long experiment (Study 1), participants used either a third- or first-person perspective in diary reflections on each day's most significant experience. Compared with preintervention assessments, assessments made after the intervention revealed that participants reflecting in the third person showed a significant increase in wise reasoning about interpersonal challenges. These effects were statistically accounted for by shifts in diary-based reflections toward a broader self-focus. A week-long experiment (Study 2) replicated the third-person self-reflection effect on wise reasoning (vs. first-person and no-pronoun control conditions). These findings suggest an efficient and evidence-based method for fostering wise reasoning.
人们如何才能明智地应对社交冲突?两项预先注册的纵向实验(研究 1:加拿大成年人;研究 2:美国和加拿大成年人;总计=555)检验了鼓励距离感(即第三人称)的自我反省是否有助于促进智慧。这两项实验都衡量了对具有挑战性的人际事件的明智推理(即智力谦逊、对情况可能如何展开的开放性、考虑并试图整合不同观点)。在为期一个月的实验(研究 1)中,参与者在日记中每天对自己最重要的经历进行第三或第一人称视角的反思。与干预前的评估相比,干预后的评估显示,以第三人称进行反思的参与者在处理人际挑战方面的明智推理能力显著提高。这些影响可以通过日记中反思从自我关注的狭隘角度转变来进行统计学解释。在为期一周的实验(研究 2)中,对明智推理(与第一人称和无代词控制条件相比)复制了第三人称自我反思的效果。这些发现为培养明智推理提供了一种高效且基于证据的方法。