Dietzschold B, Wiktor T J, Trojanowski J Q, Macfarlan R I, Wunner W H, Torres-Anjel M J, Koprowski H
J Virol. 1985 Oct;56(1):12-8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.56.1.12-18.1985.
Pathogenic parental rabies virus and apathogenic variant virus were shown to differ in their ability to infect neurons in vivo and neuroblastoma cells in vitro. After intracerebral inoculation, the distribution of infected neurons in the brain was similar for both viruses, but the rate of spread throughout the brain, the number of infected neurons, and the degree of cellular necrosis were much lower in the case of apathogenic virus. After adsorption to mouse neuroblastoma cells, apathogenic virus was less rapidly internalized than pathogenic virus, and cell-to-cell spread of apathogenic variant virus was completely prevented by the addition of rabies virus-neutralizing antibody, whereas the spread of pathogenic virus was not affected.
致病性亲代狂犬病病毒和无致病性变异病毒在体内感染神经元和体外感染神经母细胞瘤细胞的能力上存在差异。脑内接种后,两种病毒在脑中感染神经元的分布相似,但无致病性病毒在全脑的传播速度、感染神经元的数量以及细胞坏死程度要低得多。吸附到小鼠神经母细胞瘤细胞后,无致病性病毒内化速度比致病性病毒慢,添加狂犬病病毒中和抗体可完全阻止无致病性变异病毒的细胞间传播,而致病性病毒的传播则不受影响。