Suppr超能文献

复方磺胺嘧啶与复方新诺明和磺胺林治疗尿路感染的临床研究。

A clinical study of co-trimazine in comparison with co-trimoxazole and sulphalene in urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Lövestad A, Gästrin B, Lundström R

出版信息

Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 4:S401-3. doi: 10.1007/BF01639021.

Abstract

Co-trimoxazole, co-trimazine and sulphalene were tested in a controlled clinical trial of the treatment of urinary tract infections. Forty-three patients were treated with co-trimoxazole, 41 with co-trimazine, and 21 with sulphalene. During the study, sulphalene was found to be inferior to the other drugs and was excluded from further trials. The clinical efficacy of co-trimoxazole and co-trimazine was equal although the doses of trimethoprim and sulphonamide in co-trimoxazole were much higher than that in co-trimazine. In the latter sulphadiazine was used instead of sulphamethoxazole, the intention being to increase the concentration of active sulphonamide in the urine. Side effects tended to be less frequent in the patients treated with co-trimazine, although not significantly.

摘要

在一项治疗尿路感染的对照临床试验中,对复方新诺明、复方磺胺嘧啶和周效磺胺进行了测试。43名患者接受了复方新诺明治疗,41名接受了复方磺胺嘧啶治疗,21名接受了周效磺胺治疗。在研究过程中,发现周效磺胺不如其他药物,因此被排除在进一步试验之外。尽管复方新诺明中甲氧苄啶和磺胺的剂量远高于复方磺胺嘧啶,但两者的临床疗效相当。在复方磺胺嘧啶中,使用的是磺胺嘧啶而非磺胺甲恶唑,目的是提高尿液中活性磺胺的浓度。接受复方磺胺嘧啶治疗的患者副作用发生率往往较低,尽管差异不显著。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验