Centre for Agroecology Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Ryton on Dunsmore, CV8 3LG, UK.
Centre for Agroecology Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Ryton on Dunsmore, CV8 3LG, UK.
Chemosphere. 2024 Sep;363:142814. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142814. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
There is a lack of agreement on a suitable container material for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) analysis, particularly at trace levels. In this study, the losses of 18 short- and long-chain (C4-C10) PFAS to commonly used labware materials (high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene co-polymer (PPCO), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and glass were investigated. The influence of sample storage and preparation conditions, i.e., storage time, solvent composition, storage temperatures (4 °C and 20 °C), and sample agitation techniques (shaking and centrifugation) on PFAS losses to the container materials were investigated. The results showed higher losses for most of the considered PFAS (up to 50.9%) in 100% aqueous solutions after storage for 7 days regardless of the storage temperature compared to those after 3 days. Overall, the order of losses to different materials varied for individual PFAS, with the highest losses of long-chain PFAS observed to PP and HDPE after 7-day storage at room temperature. The addition of methanol to aqueous PFAS solutions reduced the losses of long-chain PFAS to all tested materials. The use of sample centrifugation and shaking did not influence the extent of losses for most of the PFAS in 80:20 water:methanol (%, v/v) to container materials except for 8:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (8:2 FTS), 9-chlorohexadecafluoro-3-oxanone-1-sulfonic acid (9Cl-PF3ONS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and 4:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (4:2 FTS). This study demonstrates lower losses of both long- and short-chain PFAS to glass and PET. It also highlights the need for caution when deciding on sample preparatory steps and storage during the analysis of PFAS.
对于全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)分析,特别是痕量分析,目前缺乏合适的容器材料的共识。在这项研究中,研究了常用实验室器具材料(高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)、聚丙烯(PP)、聚苯乙烯(PS)、共聚聚丙烯(PPCO)、聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)、聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)和玻璃)对 18 种短链和长链(C4-C10)PFAS 的损失。研究了样品储存和制备条件(储存时间、溶剂组成、储存温度(4°C 和 20°C)以及样品搅拌技术(摇晃和离心)对容器材料中 PFAS 损失的影响。结果表明,与储存 3 天后相比,在室温下储存 7 天后,大多数考虑的 PFAS(高达 50.9%)在 100%水溶液中的损失更高。总体而言,对于个别 PFAS,不同材料的损失顺序因 PFAS 而异,在室温下储存 7 天后,长链 PFAS 对 PP 和 HDPE 的损失最大。向 PFAS 水溶液中添加甲醇可减少长链 PFAS 对所有测试材料的损失。对于 80:20 水:甲醇(%,v/v)中大多数 PFAS 到容器材料的损失程度,使用样品离心和摇晃不会影响,除了 8:2 氟代烷烃磺酸(8:2 FTS)、9-氯十六氟-3-氧杂壬酮-1-磺酸(9Cl-PF3ONS)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)和 4:2 氟代烷烃磺酸(4:2 FTS)。本研究表明,玻璃和 PET 对长链和短链 PFAS 的损失较低。它还强调了在分析 PFAS 时,在决定样品制备步骤和储存时需要谨慎。