Mabry Ruth M, Doctor Henry V, Khair Mina N N, Abdelgalil Maha, Rashidian Arash
Global Health Consultant, Muscat, Oman.
Department of Science, Information and Dissemination, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;4(7):e0003451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003451. eCollection 2024.
Voluntary National Reviews are the formal mechanism for countries to report on progress and share lessons learned on SDG implementation. We assessed the Voluntary National Reviews submitted by countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region to note the reported progress on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation, the review preparation process and how health is positioned and framed to identify priorities for accelerating progress on the health-related SDGs. We extracted quantitative and qualitative data from 26 Voluntary National Reviews from 18 countries submitted during the period 2016 to January 2022. We focused on three areas: SDG implementation, the review preparation process and the positioning of health in the reviews. Three assessors conducted the data extraction based on the agreed framework according to their language of expertise (Arabic, English and French). One assessor supervised the whole process for consistency. If there was a doubt in interpretation, it was discussed and agreed among the assessors. Countries have established a mechanism for SDG implementation under high-level leadership, engaged in multistakeholder consultations, aligned and mainstreamed SDGs to national plans, and created a monitoring and review mechanism. Countries reported use of national participatory approach for the report preparation. The prioritization of both health and well-being (SDG3) and economic growth (SDG8) in the reports is unique compared to other regional and global assessments. Health was often framed around disease and health care provision without linkages to societal inequities and structural challenges. The reports indicated good progress in SDG implementation. Addressing upstream issues and the determinants of health requires the health sector to take a more strategic approach in advocating for health and well-being. Further research is needed to demonstrate how to address synergies and trade-offs of policy choices and identify the co-benefits of addressing health in the context of fiscal instability and widening inequities in the region.
自愿国家审查是各国报告可持续发展目标实施进展并分享经验教训的正式机制。我们评估了世卫组织东地中海区域各国提交的自愿国家审查,以了解在可持续发展目标实施方面报告的进展、审查编制过程,以及如何定位和阐述健康问题,从而确定加速实现与健康相关的可持续发展目标的优先事项。我们从2016年至2022年1月期间18个国家提交的26份自愿国家审查中提取了定量和定性数据。我们重点关注三个领域:可持续发展目标的实施、审查编制过程以及审查中健康的定位。三名评估人员根据商定的框架,依据各自的专业语言(阿拉伯语、英语和法语)进行数据提取。一名评估人员监督整个过程以确保一致性。如果在解释上存在疑问,评估人员会进行讨论并达成一致。各国已在高层领导下建立了可持续发展目标实施机制,开展了多利益攸关方协商,使可持续发展目标与国家计划保持一致并将其纳入主流,并建立了监测和审查机制。各国报告称在报告编制过程中采用了国家参与式方法。与其他区域和全球评估相比,报告中对健康与福祉(可持续发展目标3)和经济增长(可持续发展目标8)的优先排序独具特色。健康问题通常围绕疾病和医疗服务提供来阐述,而未与社会不平等和结构性挑战相联系。报告表明在可持续发展目标实施方面取得了良好进展。解决上游问题和健康的决定因素要求卫生部门在倡导健康与福祉方面采取更具战略性的方法。需要进一步开展研究以说明如何应对政策选择的协同效应和权衡取舍,并确定在该区域财政不稳定和不平等加剧的背景下解决健康问题的共同益处。