Suppr超能文献

豌豆蛋白补充剂联合抗阻训练方案对静坐成年人肌肉性能的影响:一项随机、对照、平行的临床试验。

Efficacy of Pea Protein Supplementation in Combination with a Resistance Training Program on Muscle Performance in a Sedentary Adult Population: A Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial.

机构信息

KGK Science Inc., London, ON N6B 3L1, Canada.

Life Sciences R&D, Roquette, 62136 Lestrem, France.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Jun 26;16(13):2017. doi: 10.3390/nu16132017.

Abstract

Animal-sourced whey protein (WPr) is the most popular protein supplement among consumers and has been shown to improve muscle mass and strength. However, due to allergies, dietary restrictions/personal choices, and growing demand, alternative protein sources are warranted. Sedentary adults were randomized to pea protein (PPr) or WPr in combination with a weekly resistance training program for 84 days. Changes in whole-body muscle strength (WBMS) including handgrip, lower body, and upper body strength, body composition, and product perception were assessed. The safety outcomes included adverse events, vital signs, clinical chemistry, and hematology. There were no significant differences in the change in WBMS, muscle mass, or product perception and likability scores between the PPr and WPr groups. The participants supplemented with PPr had a 16.1% improvement in WBMS following 84 days of supplementation ( = 0.01), while those taking WPr had an improvement of 11.1% ( = 0.06). Both study products were safe and well-tolerated in the enrolled population. Eighty-four days of PPr supplementation resulted in improvements in strength and muscle mass comparable to WPr when combined with a resistance training program in a population of healthy sedentary adults. PPr may be considered as a viable alternative to animal-sourced WPr without sacrificing muscular gains and product enjoyment.

摘要

动物源乳清蛋白(WPr)是消费者中最受欢迎的蛋白质补充剂,已被证明可以增加肌肉质量和力量。然而,由于过敏、饮食限制/个人选择以及需求的增长,有必要寻找替代蛋白质来源。久坐的成年人被随机分配到豌豆蛋白(PPr)或 WPr 中,并与每周的阻力训练计划一起进行 84 天。评估了全身肌肉力量(WBMS)的变化,包括握力、下肢和上肢力量、身体成分和产品感知。安全性结果包括不良事件、生命体征、临床化学和血液学。在 WBMS、肌肉质量或产品感知和喜爱评分方面,PPr 和 WPr 组之间没有显著差异。补充 PPr 的参与者在补充 84 天后 WBMS 提高了 16.1%( = 0.01),而服用 WPr 的参与者提高了 11.1%( = 0.06)。在纳入的人群中,两种研究产品均安全且耐受良好。在健康久坐的成年人中,与阻力训练计划相结合,84 天的 PPr 补充可提高力量和肌肉质量,与 WPr 相当。在不牺牲肌肉收益和产品享受的情况下,PPr 可以被认为是动物源 WPr 的可行替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12cb/11243455/a08d2f5bdedb/nutrients-16-02017-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验