男女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者与异性恋者联盟、学校运作及心理健康：有色人种学生与LGBTQ学生之间的关联
Gay-Straight Alliances, School Functioning, and Mental Health: Associations for Students of Color and LGBTQ Students.
作者信息
Baams Laura, Russell Stephen T
机构信息
Pedagogy and Educational Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Human Development and Family Sciences, Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
出版信息
Youth Soc. 2021 Mar;53(2):211-229. doi: 10.1177/0044118x20951045. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
Abstract
Utilizing a school-based sample of 895,218 students aged 10-18 years old, we examine differences in students' school functioning, substance use, and mental health in schools with and without Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs). In addition, we examine whether GSA presence is associated with these outcomes for students of color and LGBTQ students. Overall, students in schools with GSAs were found to report better school functioning, lower substance use, and better mental health. For students of color, the association between the presence of a GSA and mental health and substance use was not as strong as it was for non-Hispanic white students. Further, for LGBTQ students, the association between the presence of a GSA and school functioning was not as strong as it was for non-LGBTQ students. Future research is necessary to ascertain the function of GSAs, especially for marginalized youth.
摘要
我们以895218名10至18岁的在校学生为样本，研究了有同性恋异性恋联盟（GSA）和没有GSA的学校中，学生在学校表现、物质使用及心理健康方面的差异。此外，我们还研究了GSA的存在是否与有色人种学生和LGBTQ学生的这些结果相关。总体而言，发现有GSA的学校中的学生报告称学校表现更好、物质使用更少且心理健康状况更佳。对于有色人种学生，GSA的存在与心理健康及物质使用之间的关联不如非西班牙裔白人学生那么强烈。此外，对于LGBTQ学生，GSA的存在与学校表现之间的关联不如非LGBTQ学生那么强烈。有必要开展进一步研究以确定GSA的作用，尤其是对边缘化青年的作用。
相似文献
1
Gay-Straight Alliances, School Functioning, and Mental Health: Associations for Students of Color and LGBTQ Students.男女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者与异性恋者联盟、学校运作及心理健康：有色人种学生与LGBTQ学生之间的关联
Youth Soc. 2021 Mar;53(2):211-229. doi: 10.1177/0044118x20951045. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
Characteristics of Schools With and Without Gay-Straight Alliances.设有和未设有同性恋-异性恋联盟组织的学校的特点。
Appl Dev Sci. 2020;24(4):354-359. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1510778. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
3
Association Between LGBTQ Student Nondiscrimination Laws in Selected States and School District Support for Gay-Straight Alliances.某些州的 LGBTQ 学生非歧视法律与学区对同性恋-异性恋联盟的支持之间的关联。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Apr;70(4):584-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.11.032. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
LGBTQ Youth's Views on Gay-Straight Alliances: Building Community, Providing Gateways, and Representing Safety and Support.LGBTQ青年对同性恋异性恋联盟的看法：建立社区、提供途径以及代表安全与支持。
J Sch Health. 2017 Jul;87(7):489-497. doi: 10.1111/josh.12517.
5
Gay-Straight Alliances are Associated with Lower Levels of School-Based Victimization of LGBTQ+ Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.同性恋异性恋联盟与减少 LGBTQ+ 青少年在学校遭受的欺凌有关：一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jul;45(7):1269-82. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0501-7. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
The Protective Role of Gay-Straight Alliances for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning Students: A Prospective Analysis.同性恋异性恋联盟对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和性取向存疑学生的保护作用：一项前瞻性分析。
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2016 Dec;3(4):397-406. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000193.
7
High School Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) and Young Adult Well-Being: An Examination of GSA Presence, Participation, and Perceived Effectiveness.高中男女同性恋者联盟（GSAs）与青少年福祉：对GSAs的存在、参与情况及感知有效性的考察
Appl Dev Sci. 2011 Nov 7;15(4):175-185. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2011.607378.
8
How Gender-Sexuality Alliances cultivate a sense of school belonging from week to week for LGBTQ+ youth.性别-性取向联盟如何每周为 LGBTQ+ 青年培养归属感。
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Aug;105:101329. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101329. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
9
Homophobic Bullying in Positive and Negative School Climates: The Moderating Role of Gender Sexuality Alliances.在积极和消极的学校氛围中对同性恋的欺凌：性别认同联盟的调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Feb;50(2):353-366. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01297-9. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Gay-Straight Alliances, Inclusive Policy, and School Climate: LGBTQ Youths' Experiences of Social Support and Bullying.同性恋-异性恋联盟、包容政策和学校氛围：LGBTQ 青少年的社会支持和欺凌经历。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Feb;30 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):418-430. doi: 10.1111/jora.12487. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluating Community Engagement Supporting LGBTQ+ Health in Schools: Adaptation and Use of the Collaborating with Community Subscale from the Measure of School, Family, and Community Partnerships.评估支持学校中 LGBTQ+ 健康的社区参与：改编并使用《学校、家庭和社区伙伴关系量表》中“与社区合作”分量表
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 12:rs.3.rs-6735563. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6735563/v1.
2
The impact of LGBTQ-inclusive practices on student suicidality in New Mexico high schools.新墨西哥州高中里包含LGBTQ群体的举措对学生自杀倾向的影响。
Int J LGBTQ+ Youth Stud. 2025;22(3):412-428. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2024.2335522. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Support from School Personnel and In-School Resources Jointly Moderate the Association Between Identity-Based Harassment and Depressive Symptoms Among Sexual and Gender Diverse Youth.学校工作人员的支持和校内资源共同调节了性取向和性别多样化青少年中基于身份的骚扰与抑郁症状之间的关联。
J Educ Psychol. 2025 Apr;117(3):445-465. doi: 10.1037/edu0000945. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
Initiating and Sustaining GSAs Across the District as Part of a Vision for Equity: A Case Study in Chicago Public Schools.作为公平愿景的一部分，在整个学区发起并维持性别与性向联盟：芝加哥公立学校的一个案例研究
J Sch Health. 2024 Dec;94(12):1153-1163. doi: 10.1111/josh.13540. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Youth experiences in gender-sexuality alliances predict academic engagement but not disaffection through social-emotional wellbeing.青少年在性别性取向联盟中的经历预示着学业参与度，但不会通过社会情感幸福感导致情感淡漠。
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):847-864. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14209. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
6
Strategies to promote safety for sexual and gender minority youth in secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis.促进中学阶段性少数和性别少数青年安全的策略：一项纵向分析。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1642-1652. doi: 10.1111/jora.13032. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
7
Latinx Sexual Minority Adolescent Substance Use: State of the Science and Call for Intersectional Minority Stressors and Protective Factors.拉丁裔性少数青少年的物质使用：科学现状以及对交叉性少数群体压力源和保护因素的呼吁。
Curr Addict Rep. 2023 Sep;10(3):396-411. doi: 10.1007/s40429-023-00503-5. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
8
The effects of family support and smartphone-derived homestay on daily mood and depression among sexual and gender minority adolescents.家庭支持和智能手机衍生的寄宿家庭对性少数和性别少数青少年日常情绪和抑郁的影响。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Jul;133(5):358-367. doi: 10.1037/abn0000917. Epub 2024 May 9.
9
Gender Sexuality Alliances and School Safety: Who Benefits Most, and Do Additive School-Led Practices Strengthen the Link?性别、性取向与学校安全：谁受益最多？学校主导的附加实践能否加强两者的联系？
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jul;53(7):1499-1512. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01957-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
10
Putting Research on LGBTQ+ Youth in Schools to Use: The Stories and Numbers Project.将学校中关于 LGBTQ+ 青少年的研究付诸实践：故事与数据项目。
Sociol Forum (Randolph N J). 2023 Sep;38(Suppl 1):978-998. doi: 10.1111/socf.12903. Epub 2023 May 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Gay-Straight Alliances as Settings for Youth Inclusion and Development: Future Conceptual and Methodological Directions for Research on These and Other Student Groups in Schools.作为促进青少年融入与发展场所的同性恋异性恋联盟：关于学校中此类及其他学生群体研究的未来概念和方法学方向
Educ Res. 2017 Dec;46(9):508-516. doi: 10.3102/0013189x17738760. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Characteristics of Schools With and Without Gay-Straight Alliances.设有和未设有同性恋-异性恋联盟组织的学校的特点。
Appl Dev Sci. 2020;24(4):354-359. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1510778. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
3
Proposition 8 and Homophobic Bullying in California. Proposition 8 与加州恐同欺凌
Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2116. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Gay-Straight Alliances, Inclusive Policy, and School Climate: LGBTQ Youths' Experiences of Social Support and Bullying.同性恋-异性恋联盟、包容政策和学校氛围：LGBTQ 青少年的社会支持和欺凌经历。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Feb;30 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):418-430. doi: 10.1111/jora.12487. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Person-Environment Fit and Positive Youth Development in the Context of High School Gay-Straight Alliances.人-环境适配与高中同性恋异性恋联盟背景下的积极青年发展
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1:158-176. doi: 10.1111/jora.12456. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2017.青少年风险行为监测 - 美国，2017 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Jun 15;67(8):1-114. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1.
7
The Effects of Gender- and Sexuality-Based Harassment on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Substance Use Disparities.基于性别和性取向的骚扰对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者物质使用差异的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Jun;62(6):688-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
Greater Engagement Among Members of Gay-Straight Alliances: Individual and Structural Contributors.同性恋异性恋联盟成员之间更高的参与度：个人和结构因素贡献者。
Am Educ Res J. 2016 Dec;53(6):1732-1758. doi: 10.3102/0002831216674804. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
9
Are alcohol-related disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth decreasing?酒精相关的性少数青年和异性恋青年之间的差异是否在减少？
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):1931-1941. doi: 10.1111/add.13896. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
The Protective Role of Gay-Straight Alliances for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning Students: A Prospective Analysis.同性恋异性恋联盟对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和性取向存疑学生的保护作用：一项前瞻性分析。
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2016 Dec;3(4):397-406. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000193.
Zotero 插件