同性恋异性恋联盟成员之间更高的参与度：个人和结构因素贡献者。
Greater Engagement Among Members of Gay-Straight Alliances: Individual and Structural Contributors.
作者信息
Poteat V Paul, Heck Nicholas C, Yoshikawa Hirokazu, Calzo Jerel P
机构信息
Boston College.
Marquette University.
出版信息
Am Educ Res J. 2016 Dec;53(6):1732-1758. doi: 10.3102/0002831216674804. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
Abstract
Using youth program models to frame the study of Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs), we identified individual and structural predictors of greater engagement in these settings with a cross-sectional sample of 295 youth in 33 GSAs from the 2014 Massachusetts GSA Network Survey (69% LGBQ, 68% cisgen-der female, 68% White, = 16.07). Multilevel modeling results indicated that members who perceived more support/socializing from their GSA, had more LGB friends, were longer serving members, and were in GSAs with more open and respectful climates reported greater engagement. Further, there was a curvilinear association between organizational structure in the GSA and engagement: Perceptions of more structure were associated with greater engagement to a point, after which greater structure was related to less engagement.
摘要
利用青少年项目模型来构建对同性恋异性恋联盟（GSA）的研究，我们从2014年马萨诸塞州GSA网络调查的33个GSA中抽取了295名青少年的横断面样本，确定了在这些环境中更高参与度的个体和结构预测因素（69%为LGBQ，68%为顺性别女性，68%为白人，平均年龄 = 16.07岁）。多层次建模结果表明，那些从其GSA中感受到更多支持/社交、有更多LGB朋友、服务时间更长且所在GSA氛围更开放和尊重的成员报告了更高的参与度。此外，GSA的组织结构与参与度之间存在曲线关联：对更多结构的认知在一定程度上与更高的参与度相关，超过这一点后，更多的结构则与更低的参与度相关。
相似文献
1
Greater Engagement Among Members of Gay-Straight Alliances: Individual and Structural Contributors.同性恋异性恋联盟成员之间更高的参与度：个人和结构因素贡献者。
Am Educ Res J. 2016 Dec;53(6):1732-1758. doi: 10.3102/0002831216674804. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
2
Discussing Transgender Topics within Gay-Straight Alliances: Factors that Could Promote More Frequent Conversations.在同性恋-异性恋联盟中讨论跨性别议题：可能促进更频繁对话的因素。
Int J Transgend. 2018;19(2):119-131. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2017.1407983. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
3
Gay-Straight Alliance Involvement and Youths' Participation in Civic Engagement, Advocacy, and Awareness-Raising.同性恋异性恋联盟的参与以及青少年对公民参与、宣传和提高认识的参与。
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;56:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
4
Promoting Youth Agency Through Dimensions of Gay-Straight Alliance Involvement and Conditions that Maximize Associations.通过同性恋异性恋联盟参与的维度以及最大化关联的条件来促进青年能动性。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jul;45(7):1438-51. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0421-6. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
5
Gay-Straight Alliances vary on dimensions of youth socializing and advocacy: factors accounting for individual and setting-level differences.同性恋异性恋联盟在青少年社交和倡导维度上存在差异：个体和环境层面差异的影响因素。
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):422-32. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9722-2.
6
The Protective Role of Gay-Straight Alliances for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning Students: A Prospective Analysis.同性恋异性恋联盟对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和性取向存疑学生的保护作用：一项前瞻性分析。
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2016 Dec;3(4):397-406. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000193.
7
Gay-Straight Alliances as settings to discuss health topics: individual and group factors associated with substance use, mental health, and sexual health discussions.同性恋异性恋联盟作为讨论健康话题的场所：与物质使用、心理健康和性健康讨论相关的个体和群体因素。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Jun 1;32(3):258-268. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx044.
8
Investigating site-level longitudinal effects of population health interventions: Gay-Straight Alliances and school safety.调查人口健康干预措施的场所层面纵向影响：同性恋异性恋联盟与学校安全。
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jan 11;7:100350. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100350. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
GSA Advocacy Predicts Reduced Depression Disparities Between LGBQ+ and Heterosexual Youth in Schools.同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者及其他性少数群体（LGBQ+）与异性恋青少年在学校中的抑郁差异预计将因同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者及其他性少数群体权益倡导活动而缩小。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023 Feb 20:1-13. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2023.2169924.
10
LGBTQ Youth's Views on Gay-Straight Alliances: Building Community, Providing Gateways, and Representing Safety and Support.LGBTQ青年对同性恋异性恋联盟的看法：建立社区、提供途径以及代表安全与支持。
J Sch Health. 2017 Jul;87(7):489-497. doi: 10.1111/josh.12517.
引用本文的文献
1
Gay-Straight Alliances, School Functioning, and Mental Health: Associations for Students of Color and LGBTQ Students.男女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者与异性恋者联盟、学校运作及心理健康：有色人种学生与LGBTQ学生之间的关联
Youth Soc. 2021 Mar;53(2):211-229. doi: 10.1177/0044118x20951045. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
Holding the Space: Individual- and Group-level Factors Predicting Member Retention in Gender-Sexuality Alliances.坚守阵地：预测性别性取向联盟中成员留存率的个体和群体层面因素
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2023 Sep;10(3):509-521. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000557. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
Youth Advocacy Varies in Relation to Adult Advisor Characteristics and Practices in Gender-Sexuality Alliances.青年倡导在性别性取向联盟中因成年顾问的特征和做法而异。
Appl Dev Sci. 2022;26(3):460-470. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2020.1861945. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Measurement of gender as a social determinant of health in epidemiology-A scoping review.测量流行病学中性别作为健康的社会决定因素-范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 3;16(11):e0259223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259223. eCollection 2021.
5
Associations between LGBTQ+-supportive school and community resources and suicide attempts among adolescents in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州青少年的 LGBTQ+-支持型学校和社区资源与自杀企图之间的关联。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2021;91(6):800-811. doi: 10.1037/ort0000574. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
Thriving or Surviving? Raising Our Ambition for Trans Children in Primary and Secondary Schools.茁壮成长还是艰难求生？提升我们对中小学跨性别儿童的期望
Front Sociol. 2020 Aug 11;5:67. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00067. eCollection 2020.
7
Gender-sexuality alliance membership and activities: associations with students' comfort, confidence and awareness regarding substance use resources.性别-性取向联盟成员资格和活动：与学生对物质使用资源的舒适度、信心和意识的关联。
Health Educ Res. 2021 Jul 12;36(3):295-308. doi: 10.1093/her/cyab007.
8
Development of youth advocacy and sociopolitical efficacy as dimensions of critical consciousness within gender-sexuality alliances.青年倡导和社会政治效能的发展是性别-性联盟中批判性意识的维度。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;56(6):1207-1219. doi: 10.1037/dev0000927. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
9
Greater Engagement in Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) and GSA Characteristics Predict Youth Empowerment and Reduced Mental Health Concerns.参与性别认同与性倾向联盟（GSAs）和 GSA 特征预测青年赋权和减少心理健康问题。
Child Dev. 2020 Sep;91(5):1509-1528. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13345. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
Strengthening Our Schools to Promote Resilience and Health Among LGBTQ Youth: Emerging Evidence and Research Priorities from Symposium.加强学校建设，促进 LGBTQ 青年的韧性和健康：专题研讨会的新证据和研究重点。
LGBT Health. 2019 May/Jun;6(4):146-155. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0109. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
本文引用的文献
1
How gay-straight alliance groups mitigate the relationship between gay-bias victimization and adolescent suicide attempts.男女同性恋-异性恋联盟组织如何缓解同性恋偏见受害与青少年自杀企图之间的关系。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1271-1278.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
2
Contextualizing gay-straight alliances: student, advisor, and structural factors related to positive youth development among members.情境化同性恋-异性恋联盟：与成员中积极的青少年发展相关的学生、顾问和结构因素。
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):176-93. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12289. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
3
Short-term prospective effects of homophobic victimization on the mental health of heterosexual adolescents.恐同受害经历对异性恋青少年心理健康的短期前瞻性影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Aug;43(8):1240-51. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0078-3. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
4
Indicators of victimization and sexual orientation among adolescents: analyses from Youth Risk Behavior Surveys.青少年受害和性取向指标：来自青少年风险行为调查的分析。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):255-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301493. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
5
High School Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) and Young Adult Well-Being: An Examination of GSA Presence, Participation, and Perceived Effectiveness.高中男女同性恋者联盟（GSAs）与青少年福祉：对GSAs的存在、参与情况及感知有效性的考察
Appl Dev Sci. 2011 Nov 7;15(4):175-185. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2011.607378.
6
Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: a call to action for a scientifically informed approach.与 LGBT 青少年进行性行为研究的伦理和监管问题：呼吁采取科学知情的方法。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Aug;40(4):673-86. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9745-1.
7
How youth get engaged: grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs.青少年如何参与：组织青年项目中动机发展的扎根理论研究。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Jan;47(1):259-69. doi: 10.1037/a0020729.
8
Developmental Patterns of Social Trust between Early and Late Adolescence: Age and School Climate Effects.青少年早期和晚期社会信任的发展模式：年龄与学校氛围的影响
J Res Adolesc. 2010 Sep 1;20(3):748-773. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00658.x.
9
School climate for transgender youth: a mixed method investigation of student experiences and school responses. transgender 青年的学校氛围：对学生体验和学校反应的混合方法调查。
J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Oct;39(10):1175-88. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9540-7. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
10
Breadth and intensity: salient, separable, and developmentally significant dimensions of structured youth activity involvement.广度和强度：结构青年活动参与的显著、可分离和发展意义维度。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;27(Pt 4):907-33. doi: 10.1348/026151008x397017.
Zotero 插件