Tatliparmak Ali Cankut, Ozden Muhammed Furkan, Ak Rohat, Yılmaz Sarper
Emergency Department, Uskudar University, Istanbul, TUR.
Emergency Department, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62225. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62225. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Objectives This study aims to evaluate the concordance between blood gas and biochemical measurement methods for sodium and potassium levels in elderly and non-elderly patients within an emergency department (ED) setting. Methods A retrospective method comparison study was conducted at an ED from February 1, 2023, to March 1, 2023. The study included 414 patients, categorized into "elderly" (aged 65 and above; n = 138, 33.3%) and "non-elderly" (aged 18 to 64; n = 276, 66.7%) groups. Concordance was assessed using Bland-Altman, Passing-Bablok, and Lin's concordance correlation methods. Results In sodium measurements, the elderly group exhibited an average bias of -1.52 mEq/L (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.12 to -0.92), with lower and upper limits of agreement (LoA) at -8.46 and 5.42 mEq/L, respectively, indicating a broader variance than non-elderly patients, who showed an average bias of -0.82 mEq/L with limits of -4.97 to 3.32 mEq/L. For potassium, the elderly group's average bias was -0.46 mEq/L (95% CI -0.36 to -0.57), with limits of agreement from -1.68 to 0.75 mEq/L, compared to non-elderly patients with a bias of -0.29 mEq/L and limits of -0.71 to 0.13 mEq/L. Furthermore, concordance correlation coefficients revealed a reduced agreement in the elderly for both sodium ( = 0.799) and potassium ( = 0.529) compared to the non-elderly cohort (sodium = 0.821, potassium = 0.715). Conclusion The study identifies significant discrepancies in sodium and potassium levels between elderly and non-elderly patients, suggesting a need for diagnostic precision. It emphasizes the importance of customizing diagnostic approaches to better serve the elderly population in EDs.
目的 本研究旨在评估急诊科(ED)环境中老年人和非老年人患者钠和钾水平的血气分析与生化检测方法之间的一致性。方法 于2023年2月1日至2023年3月1日在一家急诊科进行回顾性方法比较研究。该研究纳入414例患者,分为“老年人”(65岁及以上;n = 138,33.3%)和“非老年人”(18至64岁;n = 276,66.7%)两组。使用Bland-Altman、Passing-Bablok和Lin一致性相关方法评估一致性。结果 在钠测量中,老年组平均偏差为-1.52 mEq/L(95%置信区间[CI]-2.12至-0.92),一致性界限(LoA)下限和上限分别为-8.46和5.42 mEq/L,表明与非老年患者相比差异更大,非老年患者平均偏差为-0.82 mEq/L,界限为-4.97至3.32 mEq/L。对于钾,老年组平均偏差为-0.46 mEq/L(95% CI -0.36至-0.57),一致性界限为-1.68至0.75 mEq/L,而非老年患者偏差为-0.29 mEq/L,界限为-0.71至0.13 mEq/L。此外,一致性相关系数显示,与非老年队列相比,老年组钠( = 0.799)和钾( = 0.529)的一致性降低(钠 = 0.821,钾 = 0.715)。结论 该研究发现老年人和非老年人患者在钠和钾水平上存在显著差异,提示需要提高诊断准确性。强调了定制诊断方法以更好地服务急诊科老年人群的重要性。