• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有效且适应性强:四项关于缩短态度对蓝色标记变量尺度的研究。

Effective and adaptable: Four studies on the shortened attitude toward the color blue marker variable scale.

机构信息

Texas State University, Management, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.

Louisiana Tech Univeristy, Management, Ruston, LA, 71272, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7985-8008. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02465-6. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02465-6
PMID:39009822
Abstract

This research is an extension of the recent scale development efforts for the marker variable Attitude Toward the Color Blue (ATCB), which addresses the efficacy of multiple shorter permutations of the scale. The purpose of this study is to develop a shorter version of an ideal marker variable scale used to detect common method variance. Potential uses of the shorter version of ATCB include intensive longitudinal studies, implementation of experience sampling methodology, or any brief survey for which the original version might be cumbersome to implement repeatedly or appear very odd to the respondent when paired with only a few other substantive items. Study 1, uses all six-, five-, and four-item versions of ATCB in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) marker technique tests on a bivariate relationship. Study 2 analyzes the best- and worst-performing versions of reduced lengths of the ATCB scale found in the first study on another bivariate relationship. Study 3 compares the original seven-item version, as well as randomly selected reduced length versions in a data set with 15 model relationships. Study 4 uses an experiment to determine the efficacy of providing respondents with one of three shorter ATCB scales in a model of three substantive variables. Our findings indicate that ATCB of different permutations and lengths can detect CMV successfully, and that researchers should choose the length of scale based on their survey length. We conclude that ATCB is adaptable for a variety of research situations, presenting it as a valuable tool for high-quality research.

摘要

这项研究是对最近用于标记变量“对蓝色的态度”(Attitude Toward the Color Blue,ATCB)的量表开发工作的扩展,该研究解决了该量表的多种较短排列的有效性问题。本研究的目的是开发一种用于检测常见方法偏差的理想标记变量量表的简短版本。ATCB 较短版本的潜在用途包括密集纵向研究、实施经验采样方法,或任何简短的调查,对于这些调查,原始版本可能由于实施次数过多而变得繁琐,或者与其他几个实质性项目一起出现时,对受访者来说显得非常奇怪。研究 1 在双变量关系上使用 ATCB 的所有六、五和四项目版本进行验证性因素分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis,CFA)标记技术测试。研究 2 在另一个双变量关系上分析了在第一项研究中发现的 ATCB 缩短长度的最佳和最差表现版本。研究 3 在具有 15 个模型关系的数据集中比较了原始的七项版本以及随机选择的缩短长度版本。研究 4 使用实验来确定在三个实质性变量模型中为受访者提供三种较短的 ATCB 量表之一的效果。我们的研究结果表明,不同排列和长度的 ATCB 可以成功检测 CMV,并且研究人员应该根据他们的调查长度选择量表的长度。我们得出结论,ATCB 适用于各种研究情况,它是一种高质量研究的有价值工具。

相似文献

1
Effective and adaptable: Four studies on the shortened attitude toward the color blue marker variable scale.有效且适应性强:四项关于缩短态度对蓝色标记变量尺度的研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7985-8008. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02465-6. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Short Versions of the EBP Beliefs Scale, the EBP Implementation Scale, and the EBP Organizational Culture and Readiness Scale.EBP 信念量表、EBP 实施量表和 EBP 组织文化与准备度量表短版的心理测量特性。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Aug;18(4):243-250. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12525. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?基于大样本和代表性瑞典样本的证据为本实践态度量表(EBPAS)的验证性因子分析:使用总量表和分量表得分是否合理?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01126-4.
5
Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.建立欧洲健康素养调查问卷的HLS-Q12简版:应用拉施模型和验证性因素分析的潜在特质分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.
6
Development of Four-Item Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale for population surveys.用于人群调查的四项目痴呆患者态度量表的编制。
Psychogeriatrics. 2024 Sep;24(5):1120-1131. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13168. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析开发并验证 6 项修订版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(RULS-6)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale (FATCOD-B) among Italian medical students.意大利医学生中弗罗梅尔特临终关怀态度量表(FATCOD-B)的验证性因素分析。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Oct;13(5):1391-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000139. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
9
Development and psychometric properties of the public attitude towards vaccination scale - Health belief model.公众对疫苗接种态度量表的编制及心理测量学特性——健康信念模型
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jun;76(6):1458-1468. doi: 10.1111/jan.14349. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
10
The sense of coherence scale: psychometric properties in a representative sample of the Czech adult population.综合性量表:在捷克成年人群体中有代表性的样本中的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 26;12(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01805-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The direct and indirect effect of neuroticism on work engagement of nurses during COVID-19: A temporal analysis.神经质对新冠疫情期间护士工作投入的直接和间接影响:一项时间序列分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:947887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947887. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Agreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings.宜人性及其后果:元分析研究结果的定量综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Aug;26(3):242-280. doi: 10.1177/10888683211073007. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Identifying careless responses in survey data.识别调查数据中的粗心回答。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55. doi: 10.1037/a0028085. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
3
The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality.人格的大六因素问卷(HEXACO-60):一种简短的人格主要维度测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jul;91(4):340-5. doi: 10.1080/00223890902935878.
4
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
5
Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis.人格五因素模型与工作满意度:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):530-41. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530.