Benediktsson Sigurður, Johannsson Erlingur, Rygh Cecilie Brekke, Gundersen Hilde
Center of Sport and Health Sciences, School of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Department of Sport, Food and Natural Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jul 1;6:1407842. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1407842. eCollection 2024.
The organisation and development strategies of youth soccer differ between Norway and Iceland. Whether this affect physical capacity is unknown. Thus, the first aim of the present study is to compare physical capacity between players from Iceland and Norway. Secondary aim is to assess associations between biological maturity and physical capacity in the Icelandic players since an association previously has been shown among the Norwegians. There were 48 U14 players from Iceland included and 103 players from Norway. Bone age (BA), measured with left-wrist x-ray, was used as an indicator of biological maturity. To measure physical capacity, 40 metre (m) linear sprint, standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (IR1-test) and a maximal oxygen uptake test (VO) were used. Training load was assessed by questionnaire. The results showed that the Norwegian players ran faster (5.90 ± 0.38 vs. 6.37 ± 0.44 s, < .001), had better intermittent endurance capacity (1,235 ± 461 vs. 960 ± 423 m, < .001) and higher VO, (60.3 ± 6.5 vs. 54.8 ± 5.3 ml·kg·min, < .001) than the Icelandic players. The players from Norway reported a higher number of weekly organised soccer training hours than the Icelandic. We also found significant correlations between BA and performance on 40 m linear sprint (r = -.566, < .001), SLJ (r = .380, = .008) and CMJ (r = .354, = .014) among the Icelandic players. Moreover, no correlations were found between BA and VO or intermittent endurance capacity. In conclusion, the Norwegian players ran faster and had better VO and intermittent endurance capacity than the Icelandic players. Biological maturity level was associated with speed and jumping performance in U14 soccer players in Iceland, but not with VO or intermittent endurance capacity. Findings indicate that more research is needed to investigate the influence of different organisation and structure of youth soccer between the two countries on physical capacity.
挪威和冰岛青少年足球的组织和发展策略有所不同。这是否会影响体能尚不清楚。因此,本研究的首要目的是比较冰岛和挪威球员的体能。次要目的是评估冰岛球员生物成熟度与体能之间的关联,因为此前在挪威球员中已显示出这种关联。研究纳入了48名冰岛U14球员和103名挪威球员。通过左手腕X光测量的骨龄(BA)被用作生物成熟度的指标。为了测量体能,采用了40米直线冲刺、立定跳远(SLJ)、纵跳(CMJ)、Yo-Yo间歇恢复测试(IR1测试)和最大摄氧量测试(VO)。通过问卷调查评估训练负荷。结果显示,挪威球员跑得更快(5.90±0.38秒对6.37±0.44秒,<0.001),间歇耐力能力更好(1235±461米对960±423米,<0.001),最大摄氧量更高(60.3±6.5对54.8±5.3毫升·千克·分钟,<0.001)相比冰岛球员。挪威球员报告的每周有组织的足球训练小时数比冰岛球员多。我们还发现冰岛球员中骨龄与直线40米冲刺成绩(r=-0.566,<0.001)、立定跳远(r=0.380,=0.008)和纵跳(r=0.354,=0.014)之间存在显著相关性。此外,未发现骨龄与最大摄氧量或间歇耐力能力之间存在相关性。总之,挪威球员比冰岛球员跑得更快,最大摄氧量和间歇耐力能力更好。生物成熟度水平与冰岛U14足球运动员的速度和跳跃表现相关,但与最大摄氧量或间歇耐力能力无关。研究结果表明,需要更多研究来调查两国青少年足球不同的组织和结构对体能的影响。