• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺切除术网站的可读性和质量评估:系统评价。

Readability and Quality Evaluation of Thyroidectomy Websites: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:652-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.052. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.052
PMID:39442293
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Online websites are a major source of educational material for patients undergoing thyroidectomy. We hypothesize that thyroidectomy websites have low quality and are written above the 6 grade readability recommendation.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of studies evaluating readability and/or quality of thyroidectomy-informing, English-written websites was performed in November 2023 in three major online databases (Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science).

RESULTS

Ten out of 2017 initially screened studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies found websites' readability above the recommended 6th grade level. Quality was heterogeneously defined and evaluated by seven of the included studies. Nonetheless, all studies deemed most thyroidectomy websites quality as poor to fair.

CONCLUSIONS

Websites addressing thyroidectomy do not meet the recommended readability level for patient educational material. The heterogeneity of scoring and reporting of quality limits comparability. This study highlights the necessity of revising and modifying existing websites to adequately aid patient decision-making.

摘要

引言

在线网站是甲状腺切除术患者主要的教育材料来源。我们假设甲状腺切除术网站质量较低,且其书写水平高于推荐的 6 年级阅读水平。

方法

2023 年 11 月,我们在三大在线数据库(Embase、PubMed 和 Web of Science)中对评估甲状腺切除术相关、英文书写的网站可读性和/或质量的研究进行了系统的文献回顾。

结果

最初筛选出的 2017 项研究中有 10 项符合纳入标准。所有研究均发现网站的可读性高于推荐的 6 年级水平。其中 7 项纳入研究对质量进行了异质性定义和评估。尽管如此,所有研究都认为大多数甲状腺切除术网站的质量较差或一般。

结论

针对甲状腺切除术的网站不符合患者教育材料的推荐可读性水平。评分和报告质量的异质性限制了可比性。本研究强调了修订和修改现有网站以充分帮助患者做出决策的必要性。

相似文献

1
Readability and Quality Evaluation of Thyroidectomy Websites: A Systematic Review.甲状腺切除术网站的可读性和质量评估:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:652-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.052. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.对谷歌搜索查询及在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料可读性的系统评估
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):435-440. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1319-z.
3
Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.关于肾癌和膀胱癌的网站的准确性与可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):926-944. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1181-z.
4
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
5
Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines?网络上的睾丸癌信息——与欧洲泌尿外科学会指南一致的患者信息合适来源?
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec;33(6):1314-1322. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1249-9.
6
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.静脉曲张患者互联网资源质量的批判性分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):1017-1024.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.互联网上食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)患者信息质量和可读性分析。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 29;2018:2849390. doi: 10.1155/2018/2849390. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
10
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.嗜铬细胞瘤患者教育材料超出推荐的可读性水平:基于三种独立阅读工具的分析
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3.