Zhou Feng, Du Haolin, Wang Yang, Fu Weiqiang, Zhao Bingchen, Zhou Jielong, Zhang Yingsheng J
Beijing StoneWise Technology Co Ltd., Haidian Street #15, Haidian District, Beijing 100080, China.
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2024 Jun 5;15(7):1017-1025. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.4c00047. eCollection 2024 Jul 11.
We employ a combination of accelerated molecular dynamics and machine learning to unravel how the dynamic characteristics of CBL-B and C-CBL confer their binding affinity and selectivity for ligands from subtle structural disparities within their binding pockets and dissociation pathways. Our predictive model of dissociation rate constants ( ) demonstrates a moderate correlation between predicted and experimental IC values, which is consistent with experimental and τ-random accelerated molecular dynamics (τRAMD) results. By employing a linear regression of dissociation trajectories, we identified key amino acids in binding pockets and along the dissociation paths responsible for activity and selectivity. These amino acids are statistically significant in achieving activity and selectivity and contribute to the primary structural discrepancies between CBL-B and C-CBL. Moreover, the binding free energies calculated from molecular mechanics with generalized Born and surface area solvation (MM/GBSA) highlight the Δ difference between CBL-B and C-CBL. The prediction, together with the key amino acids, provides important guides for designing drugs with high selectivity.
我们采用加速分子动力学和机器学习相结合的方法,以揭示CBL-B和C-CBL的动态特性如何通过其结合口袋和解离途径内的细微结构差异赋予它们对配体的结合亲和力和选择性。我们的解离速率常数预测模型表明预测值与实验IC值之间存在适度相关性,这与实验结果和τ-随机加速分子动力学(τRAMD)结果一致。通过对解离轨迹进行线性回归,我们确定了结合口袋中和沿解离路径负责活性和选择性的关键氨基酸。这些氨基酸在实现活性和选择性方面具有统计学意义,并导致CBL-B和C-CBL之间的主要结构差异。此外,通过广义玻恩模型和表面积溶剂化的分子力学计算得到的结合自由能突出了CBL-B和C-CBL之间的Δ差异。该预测与关键氨基酸一起,为设计具有高选择性的药物提供了重要指导。