Boatemaa Sandra, Barney McKenna, Drimie Scott, Harper Julia, Korsten Lise, Pereira Laura
Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Food Control. 2019 Oct;104:333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.05.009.
The recent listeriosis outbreak in South Africa brought food safety concerns to the fore in terms of both policy and practice. These concerns encompass both health and nutrition aspects, as well as the economy, because the food system in South Africa contributes significantly to economic growth and food security. However, the food sector is challenged with food safety risks, such as foodborne diseases, food fraud and a general lack of effective enforcement of regulation. The inability of government to effectively regulate the food sector is a contributing factor to increased food safety risks. Focusing on the formal sector, which is subject to regulation, this review provides an overview of the current state of food safety policies and regulations, food safety challenges, and food safety practices in the food system, after the listeriosis crisis of 2017 and 2018.
This study used a systematic process to review three sets of data in South Africa: food safety related public policies and regulations, company reports (2013-2018) and media articles (May 2017-May 2018). Food safety policies were selected from a food system policy database created by the research team. The company reports were retrieved from their websites. Factivia was used to search for the media articles. The data were thematically analyzed. The analysis framework was informed by the Food and Agriculture Organization's (FAO) food safety risk analysis. Activities related to food safety risk analysis: risk assessment, risk management, and risk communication were searched for in each material included in the study.
Seventy-four documents made up of 13 policies, 47 media articles and 15 company reports were reviewed. Food safety is regulated by three governments departments: Department of Health (DOH), Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), and Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) through bylaws and regulations. The departments are directly (DAFF) or indirectly (DOH through municipal or metro Environmental Health Professional) involved in food safety enforcement, surveillance, and education. The enforcement of different regulatory processes is often poorly coordinated. Responding to this regulatory environment, food safety activities of the food retail industry include a self-regulatory system reliant on internal and third-party food audits, worker training, external testing, and consumer education. Given this fragmented framework and the lack of interaction, it is clear that the governance of the South African food safety system is not "fit for purpose" in that there is a gap in the effectiveness of government regulation and the self-regulation of the formal sector, and a growing risk from an inability to regulate the large informal sector. Food safety challenges identified in our analysis included disease outbreaks, concerns over mislabeling, and lack of regulation for food handling and distribution.
The findings suggest that there should be a combination of responsibility from all levels of stake-holders in the food retail sector in order to improve food safety and prevent food safety breaches. In addition, strong governance of the food safety system is required to enable effective legislation and enforcement.
近期南非爆发的李斯特菌病疫情引发了政策和实践层面的食品安全担忧。这些担忧涵盖健康与营养方面以及经济领域,因为南非的食品体系对经济增长和粮食安全贡献巨大。然而,食品行业面临食品安全风险挑战,如食源性疾病、食品欺诈以及监管普遍缺乏有效执行。政府无力有效监管食品行业是食品安全风险增加的一个促成因素。本综述聚焦于受监管的正规部门,概述了2017年和2018年李斯特菌病危机后食品体系中食品安全政策与法规的现状、食品安全挑战及食品安全实践。
本研究采用系统流程对南非的三组数据进行综述:与食品安全相关的公共政策和法规、公司报告(2013 - 2018年)以及媒体文章(2017年5月 - 2018年5月)。食品安全政策从研究团队创建的食品体系政策数据库中选取。公司报告从其网站获取。使用Factivia搜索媒体文章。对数据进行主题分析。分析框架以联合国粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)的食品安全风险分析为依据。在纳入研究的每份材料中搜索与食品安全风险分析相关的活动:风险评估、风险管理和风险沟通。
共审查了74份文件,包括13项政策、47篇媒体文章和15份公司报告。食品安全由三个政府部门监管:卫生部(DOH)、农业、林业和渔业部(DAFF)以及贸易和工业部(DTI),通过附则和法规进行监管。这些部门直接(DAFF)或间接(卫生部通过市或地铁环境卫生专业人员)参与食品安全执法、监督和教育。不同监管流程的执行往往协调不佳。针对这种监管环境,食品零售行业的食品安全活动包括一个依赖内部和第三方食品审计、员工培训、外部检测以及消费者教育的自我监管系统。鉴于这种分散的框架以及缺乏互动,很明显南非食品安全体系的治理“不适用”,因为政府监管与正规部门的自我监管在有效性方面存在差距,且无法监管庞大的非正规部门带来的风险日益增加。我们分析中确定的食品安全挑战包括疾病爆发、对标签错误的担忧以及食品处理和分销缺乏监管。
研究结果表明,食品零售行业各级利益相关者应共同承担责任,以改善食品安全并防止食品安全违规行为。此外,需要对食品安全体系进行强有力的治理,以实现有效的立法和执法。