Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia.
Independent Researcher, Bellville, South Africa.
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Nov 28;27(1):e243. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001356.
To examine underlying political economy factors that enable or impede the integration of nutrition considerations into food system governance.
Comparative political economy analysis of data collected through (1) value chain analyses of selected healthy and unhealthy commodities and (2) food system policy analyses, using a theoretical framework focused on power, politics, interests and ideas.
Ghana and South Africa.
Value chain actors relevant to healthy and unhealthy foods (Ghana 121; South Africa 72) and policy stakeholders from government (Health, Agriculture, Trade and Industry, Finance), academia, civil society, development partners, Civil Society Organization (CSO) and private sector (Ghana 28; South Africa 48).
Nutrition was a stated policy priority in both countries; however, policy responsibility was located within the health sector, with limited integration of nutrition into food system sectors (including Agriculture, Trade and Industry). Contributing factors included a conceptions of policy responsibilities for nutrition and food systems, dominant ideas and narratives regarding the economic role of the food industry and the purpose of food system policy, the influence of large food industry actors, and limited institutional structures for cross-sectoral engagement and coordination.
Integrating nutrition into multi-sectoral food policy to achieve multiple food system policy goals will require strategic action across jurisdictions and regional levels. Opportunities included increasing investment in healthy traditional foods, strengthening urban/rural linkages and informal food systems, and strengthening institutional structures for policy coherence and coordination related to nutrition.
探讨使营养考虑因素融入食品系统治理的政治经济因素。
通过(1)对选定的健康和不健康商品的价值链分析,以及(2)对食品系统政策的分析,对从权力、政治、利益和思想为重点的理论框架中收集的数据进行比较政治经济学分析。
加纳和南非。
与健康和不健康食品相关的价值链参与者(加纳 121 人;南非 72 人)和政府利益相关者(卫生、农业、贸易和工业、财政)、学术界、民间社会、发展伙伴、民间社会组织(CSO)和私营部门(加纳 28 人;南非 48 人)。
营养在两个国家都是既定的政策重点;然而,政策责任仅限于卫生部门,营养在食品系统部门(包括农业、贸易和工业)的融合程度有限。促成因素包括对营养和食品系统政策责任的观念、对食品工业经济角色和食品系统政策目的的主导思想和叙述、大型食品工业行为者的影响,以及跨部门参与和协调的有限体制结构。
为了实现多个食品系统政策目标,将营养纳入多部门食品政策需要在管辖和区域各级采取战略行动。机会包括增加对健康传统食品的投资、加强城乡联系和非正式食品系统,并加强与营养相关的政策一致性和协调的体制结构。