Bruno Andreina, Dell'Aversana Giuseppina, Gilardi Silvia
Department of Education Sciences, Università degli studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Università degli studi Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 3;15:1349589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349589. eCollection 2024.
In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in attention towards promoting well-being within academic settings. In the specific context of academia, a critical issue is understanding whether the current practices for assessing and managing well-being can bridge the implementation gap and increase opportunities for creating healthy academic conditions. The paper explores the practices adopted for assessing and managing work-related stress (WRS) risks in Italian academia by referring to data from a group of Italian universities of the QoL@Work network (Quality of Life at Work in academia). The aim is to improve understanding of the factors that influence the realization of a WRS risk assessment-management pathway and how they may facilitate or hinder the transition from assessment to the implementation of interventions in the academic context. The results suggest that the assessment-management pathway should prioritize the creation of organizational scaffolding to support participatory processes in order to prevent the data collected from failing to stimulate organizational change in working conditions.
近年来，学术界对促进福祉的关注显著增加。在学术界的特定背景下，一个关键问题是了解当前评估和管理福祉的做法是否能够弥合实施差距，并增加创造健康学术环境的机会。本文通过参考来自生活质量工作网络（学术界工作生活质量）的一组意大利大学的数据，探讨了意大利学术界评估和管理与工作相关压力（WRS）风险所采用的做法。目的是更好地理解影响WRS风险评估 - 管理路径实现的因素，以及这些因素如何促进或阻碍在学术背景下从评估到干预实施的转变。结果表明，评估 - 管理路径应优先创建组织框架以支持参与性过程，以防止所收集的数据无法推动工作条件方面的组织变革。
