Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India; Centre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Indian Heart J. 2024 Jul-Aug;76(4):271-279. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India. There is no laboratory-based CVD risk data among Indians from different regions and backgrounds. This study estimated laboratory-based 10-year CVD risk across different population sub-groups.
Data from UDAY derived from cross-sectional surveys of rural and urban populations of northern (Haryana) and southern (Andhra Pradesh) India were analysed. World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension laboratory-based equations calculated 10-year CVD risk among participants without CVD history. Wilcoxon rank sum test analyzed average CVD risk across subgroups. Chi-square test compared population proportions in different CVD risk categories. Regression analysis assessed the association between CVD risk and participant characteristics.
The mean (SD) age of the participants (n = 8448) was 53.2 (9.2) years. Males in Haryana had increased CVD risk compared to those in Andhra Pradesh (p < 0.01). In both states, female gender was shown to have a protective effect on CVD risk (p < 0.01). Age correlated with increased risk (p < 0.01). Education level did not affect CVD risk however employment status may have. Hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and insufficient exercise were associated with increased CVD risk (p < 0.01). Residence (urban versus rural) and wealth index did not largely affect CVD risk.
Minor differences exist in the distribution of laboratory-based CVD risk across Indian population cohorts. CVD risk was similar in urban wealthy participants and rural poor and working-class communities in northern and southern India. Public health efforts need to target all major segments of the Indian population to curb the CVD epidemic.
心血管疾病(CVD)是印度发病率和死亡率的主要原因。不同地区和背景的印度人没有基于实验室的 CVD 风险数据。本研究评估了不同人群亚组的基于实验室的 10 年 CVD 风险。
对来自印度北部(哈里亚纳邦)和南部(安得拉邦)农村和城市人群的 UDAY 横断面调查数据进行了分析。世界卫生组织/国际高血压学会基于实验室的方程计算了无 CVD 病史参与者的 10 年 CVD 风险。Wilcoxon 秩和检验分析了亚组间平均 CVD 风险。卡方检验比较了不同 CVD 风险类别的人群比例。回归分析评估了 CVD 风险与参与者特征之间的关系。
参与者(n=8448)的平均(SD)年龄为 53.2(9.2)岁。与安得拉邦相比,哈里亚纳邦的男性 CVD 风险增加(p<0.01)。在这两个邦,女性的 CVD 风险呈保护作用(p<0.01)。年龄与风险增加相关(p<0.01)。教育程度对 CVD 风险没有影响,但就业状况可能有影响。高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、吸烟和运动不足与 CVD 风险增加相关(p<0.01)。居住地点(城市与农村)和财富指数对 CVD 风险的影响不大。
在印度人群队列中,基于实验室的 CVD 风险分布存在微小差异。在印度北部和南部的城市富裕人群和农村贫困及工人阶级社区中,CVD 风险相似。公共卫生工作需要针对印度人口的所有主要群体,以遏制 CVD 流行。