• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于精确预测爆破作业中平均破碎粒度的可解释深度学习模型。

An interpretable deep learning model for the accurate prediction of mean fragmentation size in blasting operations.

作者信息

Huan Baoqian, Li Xianglong, Wang Jianguo, Hu Tao, Tao Zihao

机构信息

Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, Yunnan, China.

Advanced Blasting Technology Engineering Research Center of Yunnan Province Education Department, Kunming, 650093, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96005-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-96005-7
PMID:40181054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11968957/
Abstract

Fragmentation size is an important indicator for evaluating blasting effectiveness. To address the limitations of conventional blasting fragmentation size prediction methods in terms of prediction accuracy and applicability, this study proposes an NRBO-CNN-LSSVM model for predicting mean fragmentation size, which integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Least Squares Support Vector Machines (LSSVM), and the Newton-Raphson Optimizer (NRBO). The study is based on a database containing 105 samples derived from both previous research and field collection. Additionally, several machine learning prediction models, including CNN-LSSVM, CNN, LSSVM, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Support Vector Regression (SVR), are developed for comparative analysis. The results showed that the NRBO-CNN-LSSVM model achieved remarkable prediction accuracy on the training dataset, with a coefficient of determination (R) as high as 0.9717 and a root mean square error (RMSE) as low as 0.0285. On the test set, the model maintained high prediction accuracy, with an R value of 0.9105 and an RMSE of 0.0403. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that the modulus of elasticity (E) was a key variable influencing the prediction of mean fragmentation size. Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) analysis further disclosed a significant positive correlation between the modulus of elasticity (E) and mean fragmentation size. In contrast, a distinct negative correlation was observed between the powder factor (P) and mean fragmentation size. To enhance the convenience of the model in practical applications, we developed an interactive Graphical User Interface (GUI), allowing users to input relevant variables and obtain instant prediction results.

摘要

块度大小是评估爆破效果的重要指标。为解决传统爆破块度大小预测方法在预测精度和适用性方面的局限性,本研究提出了一种用于预测平均块度大小的NRBO-CNN-LSSVM模型,该模型集成了卷积神经网络(CNN)、最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)和牛顿-拉夫逊优化器(NRBO)。本研究基于一个包含105个样本的数据库,这些样本来自先前的研究和现场采集。此外,还开发了几种机器学习预测模型,包括CNN-LSSVM、CNN、LSSVM、支持向量机(SVM)和支持向量回归(SVR),用于对比分析。结果表明,NRBO-CNN-LSSVM模型在训练数据集上取得了显著的预测精度,决定系数(R)高达0.9717,均方根误差(RMSE)低至0.0285。在测试集上,该模型保持了较高的预测精度,R值为0.9105,RMSE为0.0403。SHapley加法解释(SHAP)分析表明,弹性模量(E)是影响平均块度大小预测的关键变量。偏依赖图(PDP)分析进一步揭示了弹性模量(E)与平均块度大小之间存在显著的正相关关系。相比之下,发现单位炸药消耗量(P)与平均块度大小之间存在明显的负相关关系。为提高该模型在实际应用中的便利性,我们开发了一个交互式图形用户界面(GUI),允许用户输入相关变量并获得即时预测结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/c16228c5621d/41598_2025_96005_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/c48373bb3dc3/41598_2025_96005_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/cb0d85f64752/41598_2025_96005_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/981acc4cf2a4/41598_2025_96005_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/25adf76e6bc9/41598_2025_96005_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/dc72cd9dd9dd/41598_2025_96005_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/14d62cdd96eb/41598_2025_96005_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/cb1839b7e9ed/41598_2025_96005_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/028dd9ae7d46/41598_2025_96005_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/8d1ad235fd3c/41598_2025_96005_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/289f8b977dd6/41598_2025_96005_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/aefb90381e4f/41598_2025_96005_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/2e151aa1cc41/41598_2025_96005_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/9d0e9deed082/41598_2025_96005_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/b284e2d97b49/41598_2025_96005_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/4c7bb1e38c51/41598_2025_96005_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/0d8d06a80e34/41598_2025_96005_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/f5b8a34e40c5/41598_2025_96005_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/521d32d53221/41598_2025_96005_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/07c37fc0e2c7/41598_2025_96005_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/94a6400b02ac/41598_2025_96005_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/72936038bae7/41598_2025_96005_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/c16228c5621d/41598_2025_96005_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/c48373bb3dc3/41598_2025_96005_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/cb0d85f64752/41598_2025_96005_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/981acc4cf2a4/41598_2025_96005_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/25adf76e6bc9/41598_2025_96005_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/dc72cd9dd9dd/41598_2025_96005_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/14d62cdd96eb/41598_2025_96005_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/cb1839b7e9ed/41598_2025_96005_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/028dd9ae7d46/41598_2025_96005_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/8d1ad235fd3c/41598_2025_96005_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/289f8b977dd6/41598_2025_96005_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/aefb90381e4f/41598_2025_96005_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/2e151aa1cc41/41598_2025_96005_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/9d0e9deed082/41598_2025_96005_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/b284e2d97b49/41598_2025_96005_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/4c7bb1e38c51/41598_2025_96005_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/0d8d06a80e34/41598_2025_96005_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/f5b8a34e40c5/41598_2025_96005_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/521d32d53221/41598_2025_96005_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/07c37fc0e2c7/41598_2025_96005_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/94a6400b02ac/41598_2025_96005_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/72936038bae7/41598_2025_96005_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d7/11968957/c16228c5621d/41598_2025_96005_Fig22_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An interpretable deep learning model for the accurate prediction of mean fragmentation size in blasting operations.一种用于精确预测爆破作业中平均破碎粒度的可解释深度学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96005-7.
2
Predicting egg production rate and egg weight of broiler breeders based on machine learning and Shapley additive explanations.基于机器学习和夏普利加法解释预测肉种鸡产蛋率和蛋重
Poult Sci. 2025 Jan;104(1):104458. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104458. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Prediction of Blast Vibration Velocity of Buried Steel Pipe Based on PSO-LSSVM Model.基于粒子群优化极限学习机模型的埋地钢管爆破振动速度预测
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;24(23):7437. doi: 10.3390/s24237437.
4
Modeling resilient modulus of subgrade soils using LSSVM optimized with swarm intelligence algorithms.利用群智能算法优化的最小二乘支持向量机对路基土回弹模量进行建模。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 24;12(1):14454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17429-z.
5
Research on the prediction of blasting fragmentation in open-pit coal mines based on KPCA-BAS-BP.基于核主成分分析-细菌觅食算法-反向传播神经网络的露天煤矿爆破块度预测研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):16804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67139-x.
6
Machine learning and interactive GUI for concrete compressive strength prediction.用于混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习与交互式图形用户界面
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3.
7
Seasonal prediction of daily PM concentrations with interpretable machine learning: a case study of Beijing, China.基于可解释机器学习的日 PM 浓度季节性预测:以中国北京为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):45821-45836. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18913-9. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
8
Advanced predictive machine and deep learning models for round-ended CFST column.用于圆端钢管混凝土柱的先进预测机器学习和深度学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90648-2.
9
A Lightweight convolutional neural network for nicotine prediction in tobacco by near-infrared spectroscopy.一种用于通过近红外光谱法预测烟草中尼古丁含量的轻量级卷积神经网络。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 May 12;14:1138693. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1138693. eCollection 2023.
10
A comparative study of 11 non-linear regression models highlighting autoencoder, DBN, and SVR, enhanced by SHAP importance analysis in soybean branching prediction.一项对11种非线性回归模型的比较研究,重点关注自动编码器、深度信念网络和支持向量回归,并通过SHAP重要性分析在大豆分枝预测中得到增强。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 11;14(1):5905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55243-x.

本文引用的文献

1
ResFaultyMan: An intelligent fault detection predictive model in power electronics systems using unsupervised learning isolation forest.ResFaultyMan:一种基于无监督学习隔离森林的电力电子系统智能故障检测预测模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35243. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35243. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
2
Numerical and machine learning modeling of GFRP confined concrete-steel hollow elliptical columns.玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)约束混凝土-钢空心椭圆柱的数值与机器学习建模
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18647. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68360-4.
3
Machine learning and interactive GUI for concrete compressive strength prediction.
用于混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习与交互式图形用户界面
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3.
4
A robust Spearman correlation coefficient permutation test.一种稳健的斯皮尔曼相关系数排列检验。
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2024;53(6):2141-2153. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2121144. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.机器学习:趋势、观点和展望。
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):255-60. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8415.