• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄亥俄州拟议的堕胎禁令将如何影响获得堕胎护理的旅行距离。

How Ohio's proposed abortion bans would impact travel distance to access abortion care.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Jun;54(2):54-63. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12191. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.12191
PMID:35442569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324164/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Since March 2021, the Ohio legislature has been actively considering laws that would ban abortion if the United States Supreme Court overturns the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationally in 1973.

METHODS

We used a national database of publicly advertised abortion facilities to calculate driving distances for Ohioans before and after the activation of proposed abortion bans. Using a legal analysis of abortion laws following the overturn of Roe, we determined which states surrounding Ohio would continue providing abortion care. We calculated distances from each Ohio county centroid to the nearest open abortion facility in three scenarios: (1) as of February 2022, (2) the best-case post-Roe scenario (two of the five surrounding states continue to offer abortion care), and (3) worst-case post-Roe scenario (no surrounding states continue to offer abortion care). We calculated population-weighted distances using county-level data about women aged 15-44 years from the 2019 American Community Survey.

RESULTS

In February 2022, all Ohio county centroids were at most 99 miles from an abortion facility (median = 50 miles). The best-case post-Roe scenario shows 62 of Ohio's 88 counties to be 115-279 miles away from the nearest facility (median = 146). The worst-case shows 85 counties to be 191-339 miles away from the nearest facility (median = 264). The current average population-weighted driving distance from county centroid to the nearest facility is 26 miles; the post-Roe scenarios would increase this to 157 miles (best-case) or 269 miles (worst-case).

CONCLUSIONS

Ohio's proposed abortion bans would substantially increase travel distances to abortion care, impacting over 2.2 million reproductive-aged Ohioans.

摘要

背景

自 2021 年 3 月以来,俄亥俄州立法机构一直在积极考虑相关法律,如果美国最高法院推翻 1973 年使堕胎合法化的罗诉韦德案裁决,这些法律将禁止堕胎。

方法

我们使用全国范围内公开宣传的堕胎设施数据库,计算了俄亥俄州人在拟议堕胎禁令生效前后的驾驶距离。通过对罗诉韦德案被推翻后的堕胎法进行法律分析,我们确定了哪些周边州在俄亥俄州继续提供堕胎护理。我们在三种情况下计算了每个俄亥俄县中心到最近开放堕胎设施的距离:(1)截至 2022 年 2 月,(2)罗诉韦德案后最佳情况(周边五个州中的两个继续提供堕胎护理),(3)罗诉韦德案后最差情况(没有周边州继续提供堕胎护理)。我们使用 2019 年美国社区调查中关于 15-44 岁女性的县级数据,计算了人口加权距离。

结果

截至 2022 年 2 月,俄亥俄州所有县中心离堕胎设施的距离都不超过 99 英里(中位数= 50 英里)。罗诉韦德案后最佳情况下,俄亥俄州 88 个县中的 62 个县距离最近的堕胎设施为 115-279 英里(中位数= 146 英里)。最坏情况下,85 个县距离最近的堕胎设施为 191-339 英里(中位数= 264 英里)。目前,从县中心到最近设施的平均人口加权驾驶距离为 26 英里;罗诉韦德案后的情况将使这一数字增加到 157 英里(最佳情况)或 269 英里(最差情况)。

结论

俄亥俄州拟议的堕胎禁令将大幅增加获得堕胎护理的旅行距离,影响超过 220 万处于生育年龄的俄亥俄州人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/8d7b18a52687/PSRH-54-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/a4bca834293d/PSRH-54-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/1bdb9e54799d/PSRH-54-54-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/8d7b18a52687/PSRH-54-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/a4bca834293d/PSRH-54-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/1bdb9e54799d/PSRH-54-54-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb79/9324164/8d7b18a52687/PSRH-54-54-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How Ohio's proposed abortion bans would impact travel distance to access abortion care.俄亥俄州拟议的堕胎禁令将如何影响获得堕胎护理的旅行距离。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Jun;54(2):54-63. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12191. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
2
Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.罗诉韦德案被推翻后堕胎可及性和发生率的预测变化。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.139. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
3
Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion.旅行距离与最近堕胎设施的关联与堕胎率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115530. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15530.
4
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
5
Abortion before & after Roe.罗诉韦德案前后的堕胎情况。
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):804-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
6
Abortion Access in Ohio's Changing Legislative Context, 2010-2018.俄亥俄州不断变化的立法环境下的堕胎可及性,2010-2018 年。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1228-1234. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305706. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Abortion at 12 or more weeks' gestation and travel for later abortion care among Mississippi residents.密西西比州妊娠 12 周及以上的堕胎和随后堕胎护理的出行情况。
Contraception. 2022 Apr;108:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.美国多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后的堕胎设施出行时间估计和空间可达性。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2041-2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20424.
9
Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio's Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.俄亥俄州强制使用美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的药物流产方案前后的结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 30;13(8):e1002110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002110. eCollection 2016 Aug.
10
Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.堕胎与法律:罗诉韦德案和多伊诉博尔顿案的判决对医院政策的影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1976 Fall;1(3):319-37. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1-3-319.

引用本文的文献

1
Feelings about abortion at time of care: Findings from an Ohio abortion facility.护理时对堕胎的感受:俄亥俄州一家堕胎机构的调查结果
Sex Res Social Policy. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s13178-025-01097-5.
2
Examining the inaccurate reproductive health messaging of crisis pregnancy centers: A comparative qualitative study.审视危机怀孕中心不准确的生殖健康信息:一项比较性定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0325740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325740. eCollection 2025.
3
Differences in Abortion Use by Sexual Orientation in 3 National Cohorts.

本文引用的文献

1
Abortion travel within the United States: An observational study of cross-state movement to obtain abortion care in 2017.美国境内的堕胎就医之旅:2017年跨州寻求堕胎护理的观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Mar 4;10:100214. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100214. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.美国最高法院对德克萨斯州堕胎法的裁决:罗诉韦德案开始瓦解。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):621-622. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0050.
3
Selecting an Abortion Clinic: The Role of Social Myths and Risk Perception in Seeking Abortion Care.
3个全国性队列中按性取向划分的人工流产使用差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8644.
4
Estimating the economic impact of restricting reproductive healthcare access in Ohio.评估俄亥俄州限制生殖保健服务可及性的经济影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):303-314. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12286. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
The impact of state Medicaid coverage of abortion on people accessing care in three states.州医疗补助计划对堕胎的覆盖范围如何影响三个州人们获得堕胎服务的情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):255-268. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12275. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Seeking financial and practical support in an abortion-hostile state: Analysis of abortion fund data in Kentucky, 2014-2021: Analysis of abortion fund data in Kentucky.在堕胎敌对州寻求财务和实际支持:肯塔基州 2014-2021 年堕胎基金数据分析
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):222-227. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12279. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
7
Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court ruling: A machine learning approach.审视推特话语中公众对与美国最高法院裁决相关的种族态度:一种机器学习方法。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 May 4;4:1149441. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149441. eCollection 2023.
8
The patient/physician relationship in a post-Roe world: a neonatologist viewpoint.后罗诉韦德案时代的医患关系:新生儿科医生的观点。
J Perinatol. 2023 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01583-3. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
9
Seeking abortion care in Ohio and Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,俄亥俄州和得克萨斯州寻求堕胎护理。
Contraception. 2023 Feb;118:109896. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.134. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
选择堕胎诊所:社会神话与风险认知在寻求堕胎护理中的作用。
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Mar;63(1):90-104. doi: 10.1177/00221465211044413. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion.旅行距离与最近堕胎设施的关联与堕胎率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115530. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15530.
5
Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,俄亥俄州、肯塔基州和西弗吉尼亚州在扩大药物和远程医疗堕胎服务方面面临联邦、州和机构障碍。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.德克萨斯州的边境州堕胎率在众议院法案 2 号通过后上升。
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
Care Churn - Why Keeping Clinic Doors Open Isn't Enough to Ensure Access to Abortion.医疗服务反复无常——为何仅维持诊所运营不足以确保堕胎服务可及
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):508-510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2013466.
8
Ohio as a Window Into Recent US Trends on Abortion Access and Restrictions.俄亥俄州:了解美国近期堕胎准入与限制趋势的窗口。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1115-1116. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305799.
9
An Exploration of the Experiences of Florida Abortion Fund Service Recipients.佛罗里达堕胎基金服务接受者的经历探索。
Health Soc Work. 2020 Aug 1;45(3):186-194. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlaa012.
10
Abortion Access in Ohio's Changing Legislative Context, 2010-2018.俄亥俄州不断变化的立法环境下的堕胎可及性,2010-2018 年。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1228-1234. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305706. Epub 2020 May 21.