Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China (M.H., C.S., H.H., D.G.).
Department of Epidemiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China (M.H., K.H., H.H., F.L., J.L., J. Chen, J. Cao, S.C., L.Z., Y.L., J.H., X. Lu, D.G.).
Stroke. 2024 Aug;55(8):2066-2074. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046811. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
Previous studies focusing on assessing the effects of remnant cholesterol (RC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on stroke may not consider their mutual influence. We aimed to explore the associations of RC and discordant high RC with LDL-C with stroke, ischemic stroke (IS), and hemorrhagic stroke.
This prospective cohort study was conducted based on 3 cohorts of the China-PAR (Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in China) project. RC was calculated as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol minus LDL-C estimated by Martin/Hopkins equations. Concordant/discordant categories for RC versus LDL-C were determined based on cut-points of 130 mg/dL for LDL-C and equivalent percentile (32.50 mg/dL) for RC. Cox models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs for incident stroke.
Among 113 448 participants recruited at baseline, a total of 98 967 participants were eligible for the final analysis (mean age of 51.44 years; 40.45% were men). During 728 776.87 person-years of follow-up, 2859 stroke cases, 1811 IS cases, and 849 hemorrhagic stroke cases were observed. RC was positively associated with stroke and IS, but not hemorrhagic stroke, with adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 1.06 (1.02-1.10), 1.09 (1.04-1.13), and 0.95 (0.88-1.03) for per SD increase in RC. Compared with low LDL-C/low RC group, low LDL-C/high RC group had higher risks of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.30]) and IS (1.19, 1.03-1.38), while high LDL-C/low RC group had no increased risk of stroke (1.07 [0.95-1.20]) and IS (1.09 [0.94-1.25]).
Higher RC was associated with increased risks of stroke and IS but not hemorrhagic stroke. Discordantly high RC, not discordantly high LDL-C, conferred higher risks of stroke and IS. Our findings support further lowering RC by interventions to reduce residual IS risk.
之前的研究主要关注残余胆固醇(RC)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)对中风的影响,但可能没有考虑到它们之间的相互影响。本研究旨在探讨 RC 和 RC 与 LDL-C 不相符与中风、缺血性中风(IS)和出血性中风的相关性。
这是一项基于中国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测(China-PAR)项目的 3 个队列的前瞻性队列研究。RC 是通过 Martin/Hopkins 方程估计的 LDL-C 减去非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算得出的。RC 与 LDL-C 相符/不相符的类别是根据 LDL-C 的 130mg/dL 切点和 RC 的等效百分位数(32.50mg/dL)确定的。Cox 模型用于估计事件性中风的调整后危险比和 95%置信区间。
在基线时招募的 113448 名参与者中,共有 98967 名参与者符合最终分析的条件(平均年龄为 51.44 岁,40.45%为男性)。在 728776.87 人年的随访中,观察到 2859 例中风、1811 例 IS 和 849 例出血性中风。RC 与中风和 IS 呈正相关,但与出血性中风无关,RC 每增加 1 个标准差,调整后的危险比(95%CI)分别为 1.06(1.02-1.10)、1.09(1.04-1.13)和 0.95(0.88-1.03)。与低 LDL-C/低 RC 组相比,低 LDL-C/高 RC 组中风(调整后危险比,1.15[95%CI,1.02-1.30])和 IS(1.19,1.03-1.38)的风险更高,而高 LDL-C/低 RC 组中风(1.07[0.95-1.20])和 IS(1.09[0.94-1.25])的风险无显著增加。
较高的 RC 与中风和 IS 风险的增加相关,但与出血性中风无关。RC 不相符,而非 LDL-C 不相符,与中风和 IS 的风险增加相关。我们的研究结果支持通过降低残余 IS 风险的干预措施进一步降低 RC。