Wilhøft Kristensen Anne, Grau Cai, Jensen Kenneth, Oksbjerre Dalton Susanne, Friborg Jeppe, Lunde Jensen Annesofie
Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Oncology & Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Rådmandsengen 5, 4700 Næstved, Denmark.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jun 27;31:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Physicians manage multiple obligations, providing best-practice treatment and patient- centred care in the standard treatment pathway while contributing to clinical trials simultaneously. These multifaceted responsibilities may introduce barriers and dilemmas to clinical trial execution, potentially impacting the clinical trial decision- making process. This study explores physicians' barriers and dilemmas in executing clinical trials and the impact on clinical trial decision-making.
Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced oncologists. Moreover, participant observations were performed during clinical encounters involving discussions about clinical trials. The analysis followed a structured approach: (1) transcription of data, (2) inductive text coding, (3) exploration of patterns, and (4) interpretation, leading to the results. The results were discussed and validated by the study participants.
The results comprise (1) a description of the clinical practice, which presents the setting of clinical trial execution; (2) results regarding physicians' barriers and dilemmas in executing clinical trials, leading to (3) the impact on clinical trial decision- making. The results involve barriers to time constraints for clinical trial tasks, dilemmas emerging from trial requirements or deviations from standard guidelines, and challenges with providing sufficient trial communication and adequate decision-making support, balancing between a paternalistic approach and respecting patient autonomy.
The demanding obligations of clinical practice constitute a complex setting for executing clinical trials, resulting in numerous barriers and dilemmas that impact the decision-making process in clinical trials. The study emphasises the need for tailored clinical trial decision-making interventions to facilitate supportive, informed, and non-directive clinical trial decision-making.
医生承担着多项职责,既要在标准治疗路径中提供最佳实践治疗和以患者为中心的护理,同时还要参与临床试验。这些多方面的责任可能给临床试验的执行带来障碍和困境,从而潜在地影响临床试验的决策过程。本研究探讨医生在执行临床试验过程中遇到的障碍和困境以及对临床试验决策的影响。
对经验丰富的肿瘤学家进行了定性半结构化访谈。此外,在涉及临床试验讨论的临床会诊期间进行了参与观察。分析采用结构化方法:(1)数据转录,(2)归纳文本编码,(3)模式探索,以及(4)解释,从而得出结果。研究参与者对结果进行了讨论和验证。
结果包括(1)对临床实践的描述,呈现了临床试验执行的背景;(2)关于医生在执行临床试验时遇到的障碍和困境的结果,进而导致(3)对临床试验决策的影响。结果涉及临床试验任务的时间限制障碍、试验要求或偏离标准指南所产生的困境,以及在提供充分的试验沟通和适当的决策支持方面的挑战,即在家长式方法和尊重患者自主权之间取得平衡。
临床实践的苛刻要求构成了执行临床试验的复杂环境,导致众多影响临床试验决策过程的障碍和困境。该研究强调需要有针对性的临床试验决策干预措施,以促进支持性、明智且非指导性的临床试验决策。